Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30037348›Full record

ArticleBMC musculoskeletal disorders2018

Global postural re-education in pediatric idiopathic scoliosis: a biomechanical modeling and analysis of curve reduction during active and assisted self-correction.

Sarah Dupuis, Carole Fortin, Christiane Caouette, Isabelle Leclair, Carl-Éric Aubin

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 56 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. An effective active self-correction in standing without external aids is possible in adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis: a cross-sectional study.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sarah DupuisDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, École Polytechnique de Montréal, P.O. Box 6097, Downtown Station, Station "Centre-ville", Montreal, Quebec, H3C 3A7, Canada.
Carole FortinResearch Centre, Sainte-Justine University Hospital Centre, 3175 chemin de la Côte-Sainte-Catherine, Montreal, Quebec, H3T 1C5, Canada.
Christiane CaouetteDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, École Polytechnique de Montréal, P.O. Box 6097, Downtown Station, Station "Centre-ville", Montreal, Quebec, H3C 3A7, Canada.
Isabelle LeclairResearch Centre, Sainte-Justine University Hospital Centre, 3175 chemin de la Côte-Sainte-Catherine, Montreal, Quebec, H3T 1C5, Canada.
Carl-Éric AubinDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, École Polytechnique de Montréal, P.O. Box 6097, Downtown Station, Station "Centre-ville", Montreal, Quebec, H3C 3A7, Canada. carl-eric.aubin@polymtl.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2374-008X
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-Justine · CA

Funding

Fonds de Recherche du Québec - Santé Junior 1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGlobal postural re-education (GPR) is a physiotherapy treatment approach for pediatric idiopathic scoliosis (IS), where the physiotherapist qualitatively assesses scoliotic curvature reduction potential (with a manual correction) and patient's ability to self-correct (self-correction). To the author's knowledge, there are no studies regarding GPR applied to IS, hence there is a need to better understand the biomechanics of GPR curve reduction postures. The objective was to biomechanically and quantitatively evaluate those two re-education corrections using a computer model combined with experimental testing.

methodsFinite elements models of 16 patients with IS (10.5-15.4 years old, average Cobb angle of 33°) where built from surface scans and 3D radiographic reconstructions taken in normal standing and self-corrected postures. The forces applied with the therapist's hands over the trunk during manual correction were recorded and used in the FEM to simulate this posture. Self-correction was simulated by moving the thoracic and lumbar apical vertebrae from their presenting position to their self-corrected position as seen on radiographs. A stiffness index was defined for each posture as the global force required to stay in the posture divided by the thoracic curve reduction (force/Cobb angle reduction).

resultsThe average force applied by the therapist during manual correction was 31 N and resulted in a simulated average reduction of 26% (p < 0.05), while kyphosis slightly increased and lordosis remained unchanged. The actual self-correction reduced the thoracic curve by an average of 33% (p < 0.05), while the lumbar curve remained unchanged. The thoracic kyphosis and lumbar lordosis were reduced on average by 6° and 5° (p < 0.05). Self-correction simulations correlated with actual self-correction (r = 0.9).

conclusionsThis study allowed quantification of thoracic curve reducibility obtained by external forces applications as well as patient's capacity to self-correct their posture, two corrections commonly used in the GPR approach.

Indexed as

Computer SimulationPhysical Therapy ModalitiesAdolescentBiomechanical PhenomenaChildFemaleHumansMalePatient Education as TopicPostureScoliosisSelf CareTreatment OutcomeBiomechanical modelingFinite element modelGlobal postural re-educationScoliosis

Identifiers

PMID30037348
PMCPMC6055339
OpenAlexW2808995971

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.