Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30037299›Full record

ArticleCell cycle (Georgetown, Tex.)2018

Loss of p53 expression in cancer cells alters cell cycle response after inhibition of exportin-1 but does not prevent cell death.

Joshua M Marcus, Russell T Burke, Andrea E Doak, Soyeon Park, James D Orth

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cell cycle (Georgetown, Tex.), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. The Influence of Cell Cycle Regulation on Chemotherapy.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Joshua M Marcusa Department of Molecular, Cellular, and Developmental Biology , University of Colorado Boulder , Boulder , CO , USA.
Russell T Burkea Department of Molecular, Cellular, and Developmental Biology , University of Colorado Boulder , Boulder , CO , USA.
Andrea E Doaka Department of Molecular, Cellular, and Developmental Biology , University of Colorado Boulder , Boulder , CO , USA.
Soyeon Parka Department of Molecular, Cellular, and Developmental Biology , University of Colorado Boulder , Boulder , CO , USA.
James D Ortha Department of Molecular, Cellular, and Developmental Biology , University of Colorado Boulder , Boulder , CO , USA.
University of Colorado Boulder · US

Funding

TRAINING IN SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION &CELL CYCLE REGULATIONT32GM008759 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO AT BOULDER · PI AHN, NATALIE G. · 2000 to 2020
$5.9M
Predoctoral Training Program in Signaling and Cellular Regulation INCLUDE Down Syndrome SupplementT32GM142607 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO · PI Sabrina Leigh Spencer, Tin Tin Su · 2021 to 2026
$3.6M
Mechanisms of Chaperone-Mediated Control in the Assembly of the Proteasome HoloenzymeR01GM127688 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO · PI PARK, SOYEON · 2018 to 2022
$1.6M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM127688NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM008759NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM142607
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The tumor suppressor protein p53 is central to the cellular stress response and may be a predictive biomarker for cancer treatments. Upon stress, wildtype p53 accumulates in the nucleus where it enforces cellular responses, including cell cycle arrest and cell death. p53 is so dominant in its effects, that p53 enforcement - or - restoration therapy is being studied for anti-cancer therapy. Two mechanistically distinct small molecules that act via p53 are the selective inhibitor of nuclear export, selinexor, and MDM2 inhibitor, nutlin-3a. Here, individual cells are studied to define cell cycle response signatures, which captures the variability of responses and includes the impact of loss of p53 expression on cell fates. The individual responses are then used to build the population level response. Matched cell lines with and without p53 expression indicate that while loss-of-function results in altered cell cycle signatures to selinexor treatment, it does not diminish overall cell loss. On the contrary, response to single-agent nutlin-3a shows a strong p53-dependence. Upon treatment with both selinexor and nutlin-3a there are combination effects in at least some cell lines - even when p53 is absent. Collectively, the findings indicate that p53 does act downstream of selinexor and nutlin-3a, and that p53 expression is dispensable for selinexor to cause cell death, but nutlin-3a response is more p53-dependent. Thus, TP53 disruption and lack of expression may not predict poor cell response to selinexor, and selinexor's mechanism of action potentially provides for strong efficacy regardless of p53 function.

Indexed as

ApoptosisCell CycleAntineoplastic AgentsCell Cycle CheckpointsCell LineageCell Line, TumorCell SurvivalExportin 1 ProteinG1 PhaseHumansHydrazinesImidazolesKaryopherinsNeoplasmsPiperazinesProto-Oncogene Proteins c-mdm2Antineoplastic AgentsExportin 1 ProteinHydrazinesImidazolesKaryopherinsnutlin 3PiperazinesProto-Oncogene Proteins c-mdm2Receptors, Cytoplasmic and NuclearselinexorTriazolesTumor Suppressor Protein p53cell cyclecell fateExportin-1nutlin-3ap53selinexor

Identifiers

PMID30037299
PMCPMC6110605
OpenAlexW2884216060

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.