Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30037048›Full record

ReviewNutrients2018

Dietary Protein, Muscle and Physical Function in the Very Old.

Bernhard Franzke, Oliver Neubauer, David Cameron-Smith, Karl-Heinz Wagner

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nutrients, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06157385 (The Effect of Culinary Medicine to Enhance Protein Intake on Muscle Quality in Older Adults), which is not on this map. Cited by 35 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06157385 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

The Effect of Culinary Medicine to Enhance Protein Intake on Muscle Quality in Older Adults

TypeinterventionalSponsorTexas Tech UniversityRan2023 to 2024Enrolled28ConditionsSarcopeniaArmsCulinary Medicine, Control
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 74 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Nutritional Interventions: Dietary Protein Needs and Influences on Skeletal Muscle of Older Adults.The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences · 2023
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Bernhard FranzkeResearch Platform Active Ageing, University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria. bernhard.franzke@univie.ac.at.ORCID 0000-0001-6762-2777
Oliver NeubauerResearch Platform Active Ageing, University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria. oliver.neubauer@univie.ac.at.ORCID 0000-0001-6835-8787
David Cameron-SmithLiggins Institute, University of Auckland, Private Bag 92019, Auckland, New Zealand. d.cameron-smith@auckland.ac.nz.ORCID 0000-0002-0144-5816
Karl-Heinz WagnerResearch Platform Active Ageing, University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria. karl-heinz.wagner@univie.ac.at.
University of Vienna · ATUniversity of Auckland · NZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is an ongoing debate as to the optimal protein intake in older adults. An increasing body of experimental studies on skeletal muscle protein metabolism as well as epidemiological data suggest that protein requirements with ageing might be greater than many current dietary recommendations. Importantly, none of the intervention studies in this context specifically investigated very old individuals. Data on the fastest growing age group of the oldest old (aged 85 years and older) is very limited. In this review, we examine the current evidence on protein intake for preserving muscle mass, strength and function in older individuals, with emphasis on data in the very old. Available observational data suggest beneficial effects of a higher protein intake with physical function in the oldest old. Whilst, studies estimating protein requirements in old and very old individuals based on whole-body measurements, show no differences between these sub-populations of elderly. However, small sample sizes preclude drawing firm conclusions. Experimental studies that compared muscle protein synthetic (MPS) responses to protein ingestion in young and old adults suggest that a higher relative protein intake is required to maximally stimulate skeletal muscle MPS in the aged. Although, data on MPS responses to protein ingestion in the oldest old are currently lacking. Collectively, the data reviewed for this article support the concept that there is a close interaction of physical activity, diet, function and ageing. An attractive hypothesis is that regular physical activity may preserve and even enhance the responsiveness of ageing skeletal muscle to protein intake, until very advanced age. More research involving study participants particularly aged ≥85 years is warranted to better investigate and determine protein requirements in this specific growing population group.

Indexed as

Activities of Daily LivingFeeding BehaviorNutritional RequirementsAged, 80 and overAgingDietDietary ProteinsExerciseFemaleHumansMaleMuscle ProteinsMuscle, SkeletalMuscle StrengthNutritional StatusSarcopeniaDietary ProteinsMuscle Proteinsageingamino acidsanabolic resistancecentenariansexercisenonagenariansoctogenariansprotein requirementsskeletal muscle health

Identifiers

PMID30037048
PMCPMC6073115
OpenAlexW2884499556

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.