ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2018
Computational Approaches to Prioritize Cancer Driver Missense Mutations.
Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.
- An interpretable molecular framework for predicting cancer driver missense mutations.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026Article
- Genomic structural equation modeling reveals shared genetic structure of cardiac function and structure-function association studies of CLCNKA mutations.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- ITGA4 as a potential prognostic and immunotherapeutic biomarker in human cancer and its clinical significance in gastric cancer: an integrated analysis and validation.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- Exploring Bioinformatics Tools to Analyze the Role of CDC6 in the Progression of Polycystic Ovary Syndrome to Endometrial Cancer by Promoting Immune Infiltration.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- Machine learning optimized DriverDetect software for high precision prediction of deleterious mutations in human cancers.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Review
- Article
- Prediction of cancer driver genes and mutations: the potential of integrative computational frameworks.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2024Review
- Article
- Yeast as a Tool to Understand the Significance of Human Disease-Associated Gene Variants.Genes · 2021Review
- Computational Saturation Mutagenesis of SARS-CoV-1 Spike Glycoprotein: Stability, Binding Affinity, and Comparison With SARS-CoV-2.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2021Article
- Article
- Article
- Machine Learning Approaches for Quality Assessment of Protein Structures.Biomolecules · 2020Review
- Article
- A decision tree to improve identification of pathogenic mutations in clinical practice.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2020Article
- Review
- Insights into the Effects of Cancer Associated Mutations at the UPF2 and ATP-Binding Sites of NMD Master Regulator: UPF1.International journal of molecular sciences · 2019Article
- Pathogenicity and functional impact of non-frameshifting insertion/deletion variation in the human genome.PLoS computational biology · 2019Article
- Review: Precision medicine and driver mutations: Computational methods, functional assays and conformational principles for interpreting cancer drivers.PLoS computational biology · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Cancer is a complex disease that is driven by genetic alterations. There has been a rapid development of genome-wide techniques during the last decade along with a significant lowering of the cost of gene sequencing, which has generated widely available cancer genomic data. However, the interpretation of genomic data and the prediction of the association of genetic variations with cancer and disease phenotypes still requires significant improvement. Missense mutations, which can render proteins non-functional and provide a selective growth advantage to cancer cells, are frequently detected in cancer. Effects caused by missense mutations can be pinpointed by in silico modeling, which makes it more feasible to find a treatment and reverse the effect. Specific human phenotypes are largely determined by stability, activity, and interactions between proteins and other biomolecules that work together to execute specific cellular functions. Therefore, analysis of missense mutations' effects on proteins and their complexes would provide important clues for identifying functionally important missense mutations, understanding the molecular mechanisms of cancer progression and facilitating treatment and prevention. Herein, we summarize the major computational approaches and tools that provide not only the classification of missense mutations as cancer drivers or passengers but also the molecular mechanisms induced by driver mutations. This review focuses on the discussion of annotation and prediction methods based on structural and biophysical data, analysis of somatic cancer missense mutations in 3D structures of proteins and their complexes, predictions of the effects of missense mutations on protein stability, protein-protein and protein-nucleic acid interactions, and assessment of conformational changes in protein conformations induced by mutations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.