Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30036884›Full record

ArticleOncology2018

Predictive Factors of Eribulin Activity in Metastatic Breast Cancer Patients.

Rita De Sanctis, Elisa Agostinetto, Giovanna Masci, Emanuela Ferraro, Agnese Losurdo, Alessandro Viganò, Lidija Antunovic, Monica Zuradelli, Rosalba Maria Concetta Torrisi, Armando Santoro

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oncology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Rita De SanctisDepartment of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Humanitas Cancer Center and Research Hospital, IRCCS, Rozzano, Milan, Italy.
Elisa AgostinettoDepartment of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Humanitas Cancer Center and Research Hospital, IRCCS, Rozzano, Milan, Italy.
Giovanna MasciDepartment of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Humanitas Cancer Center and Research Hospital, IRCCS, Rozzano, Milan, Italy.
Emanuela FerraroDepartment of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Humanitas Cancer Center and Research Hospital, IRCCS, Rozzano, Milan, Italy.
Agnese LosurdoDepartment of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Humanitas Cancer Center and Research Hospital, IRCCS, Rozzano, Milan, Italy.
Alessandro ViganòMolecular and Cellular Networks Lab, Department of Anatomy, Histology, Forensic Medicine and Orthopaedics, "Sapienza" University, Rome, Italy.
Lidija AntunovicDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Humanitas Cancer Center and Research Hospital, IRCCS, Rozzano, Milan, Italy.
Monica ZuradelliDepartment of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Humanitas Cancer Center and Research Hospital, IRCCS, Rozzano, Milan, Italy.
Rosalba Maria Concetta TorrisiDepartment of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Humanitas Cancer Center and Research Hospital, IRCCS, Rozzano, Milan, Italy.
Armando SantoroDepartment of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Humanitas Cancer Center and Research Hospital, IRCCS, Rozzano, Milan, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesPredictive factors of response to eribulin are lacking. We aimed to investigate the activity and safety of eribulin in a real-world population of metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients and to identify possible predictive factors of progression-free survival (PFS) and objective response.

methodsWe retrospectively analyzed 71 eribulin-treated MBC patients. Best response rate, PFS, and adverse events (AEs) were evaluated. The impact of different clinical-pathological factors on PFS was evaluated using the Cox proportional hazards model. Predictive factors of response were identified by discriminant function analysis (DFA).

resultsMedian PFS was 3.75 months (95% CI, 2.39-4.48); 12 patients (16.90%) achieved partial response (PR), 27 (38.03%) stable disease. The most common AEs were fatigue (25.83%), neutropenia (16.56%), and peripheral neuropathy (13.91%). A worse performance status (p = 0.025) and a higher number of metastatic organ sites (p = 0.011) were associated with a worse PFS under eribulin. Overall, in the DFA-predictive model, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio at baseline, estrogen receptor, Ki67, histology, and age were predictive of PR with 100% accuracy.

conclusionsActivity and safety profiles of eribulin were consistent with literature data. Performance status and number of metastatic sites were predictive factors of PFS. DFA could be a promising tool to discriminate responses to eribulin among MBC patients.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAntineoplastic AgentsBreast NeoplasmsDisease-Free SurvivalFemaleFuransHumansKetonesMaleMiddle AgedPolyether PolyketidesProportional Hazards ModelsRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeAntineoplastic AgentseribulinFuransKetonesPolyether PolyketidesDiscriminant functional analysisEribulinMetastatic breast cancerProgression-free survival

Identifiers

PMID30036884
PMCPMC6193748

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.