Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30036396›Full record

ArticlePloS one2018

Identification of attractive odorants released by preferred bacterial food found in the natural habitats of C. elegans.

Soleil E Worthy, Lillian Haynes, Melissa Chambers, Danika Bethune, Emily Kan, Kevin Chung, Ryan Ota, Charles J Taylor, Elizabeth E Glater

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 47 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
47citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

47 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. eLife · 2025
    Article
  8. Microbiology spectrum · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. microPublication biology · 2025
    Article
  14. The AWCmicroPublication biology · 2025
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Understanding the factors regulating host-microbiome interactions usingPhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2024
    Review
  18. Selenium-EnrichedAntioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Soleil E WorthyDepartment of Chemistry, Pomona College, Claremont, California, United States of America.
Lillian HaynesDepartment of Biology, Harvey Mudd College, Claremont, California, United States of America.
Melissa ChambersDepartment of Neuroscience, Pomona College, Claremont, California, United States of America.
Danika BethuneDepartment of Neuroscience, Pomona College, Claremont, California, United States of America.
Emily KanDepartment of Neuroscience, Pomona College, Claremont, California, United States of America.
Kevin ChungDepartment of Neuroscience, Pomona College, Claremont, California, United States of America.
Ryan OtaDepartment of Neuroscience, Pomona College, Claremont, California, United States of America.
Charles J TaylorDepartment of Chemistry, Pomona College, Claremont, California, United States of America.
Elizabeth E GlaterDepartment of Neuroscience, Pomona College, Claremont, California, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-0205-8209

Funding

Howard Hughes Medical Institute
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Food choice is critical for survival because organisms must choose food that is edible and nutritious and avoid pathogenic food. Many organisms, including the nematode C. elegans, use olfaction to detect and distinguish among food sources. C. elegans exhibits innate preferences for the odors of different bacterial species. However, little is known about the preferences of C. elegans for bacterial strains isolated from their natural environment as well as the attractive volatile compounds released by preferred natural bacteria isolates. We tested food odor preferences of C. elegans for non-pathogenic bacteria found in their natural habitats. We found that C. elegans showed a preference for the odor of six of the eight tested bacterial isolates over its standard food source, E. coli HB101. Using solid-phase microextraction and gas chromatography coupled with mass spectrometry, we found that four of six attractive bacterial isolates (Alcaligenes sp. JUb4, Providenica sp. JUb5, Providencia sp. JUb39, and Flavobacteria sp. JUb43) released isoamyl alcohol, a well-studied C. elegans attractant, while both non-attractive isolates (Raoultella sp. JUb38 and Acinetobacter sp. JUb68) released very low or non-detectable amounts of isoamyl alcohol. In conclusion, we find that isoamyl alcohol is likely an ethologically relevant odor that is released by some attractive bacterial isolates in the natural environment of C. elegans.

Indexed as

Caenorhabditis elegansEcosystemFood PreferencesOdorantsAnimalsBacteriaChoice BehaviorGas Chromatography-Mass SpectrometryPentanolsPhysical StimulationPredatory BehaviorVolatile Organic Compoundsisopentyl alcoholPentanolsVolatile Organic Compounds

Identifiers

PMID30036396
PMCPMC6056031

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.