Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30036381›Full record

ArticlePloS one2018

Self-sampling coupled to the detection of HPV 16 and 18 E6 protein: A promising option for detection of cervical malignancies in remote areas.

Kátia Luz Torres, Josiane Montanho Mariño, Danielle Albuquerque Pires Rocha, Mônica Bandeira de Mello, Heydy Halanna de Melo Farah, Renato Dos Santos Reis, Valquíria do Carmo Rodrigues Alves, Edson Gomes, Toni Ricardo Martins, Ana Carolina Soares and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. A New Brazilian Device for Cervical Cancer Screening: Acceptability and Accuracy of Self-sampling.Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia · 2023
    Article
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Kátia Luz TorresPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Ciências da Saúde da Universidade Federal do Amazonas (UFAM), Manaus, Amazonas/Brazil.
Josiane Montanho MariñoUniversidade Federal do Amazonas-UFAM, Coari, Amazonas/Brazil.
Danielle Albuquerque Pires RochaPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Ciências da Saúde da Universidade Federal do Amazonas (UFAM), Manaus, Amazonas/Brazil.
Mônica Bandeira de MelloFundação Centro de Oncologia do Estado do Amazonas (FCECON), Manaus, Amazonas/Brazil.
Heydy Halanna de Melo FarahPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Imunologia Básica e Aplicada da Universidade Federal do Amazonas (UFAM), Manaus, Amazonas/Brazil.
Renato Dos Santos ReisUniversidade Federal do Amazonas-UFAM, Coari, Amazonas/Brazil.
Valquíria do Carmo Rodrigues AlvesPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Imunologia Básica e Aplicada da Universidade Federal do Amazonas (UFAM), Manaus, Amazonas/Brazil.
Edson GomesLaboratório Sebastião Marinho, Manaus, Amazonas/Brazil.
Toni Ricardo MartinsInstituto de Medicina Tropical da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo/Brazil.
Ana Carolina SoaresInstituto de Medicina Tropical da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo/Brazil.
Cristina Mendes de OliveiraInstituto de Medicina Tropical da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo/Brazil.
José Eduardo LeviInstituto de Medicina Tropical da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo/Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-3557-2717
Universidade de São Paulo · BRUniversidade Federal do Amazonas · BRFundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Amazonas · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo evaluate both the performance and acceptability of a method coupling self-sampling with detection of cervical malignancy via elevated HPV 16 and 18 E6 oncoproteins (OncoE6™ Cervical Test) in remote areas in Brazil.

methodsWomen living in rural villages in proximity to Coari city, Amazonas, Brazil were invited to participate in a cervical cancer screening study. 412 subjects were enrolled; there were no refusals. In addition to E6 protein detection, DNA was extracted from the brushes and evaluated for HPV genotypes by PCR (PGMY09/11), followed by typing by the Papillocheck™ if positive. Subjects who were found to be positive for OncoE6 or HPV-DNA were referred for colposcopy.

resultsFor 110 subjects (27%) this was the first cervical cancer exam. Overall the HPV-DNA prevalence was 19.1% (n = 79); 1.4% (n = 6) were positive by the OncoE6 Test. Fifty-six women attended the invitation for colposcopy where nine had an abnormal cervix and were subsequently biopsied. Histopathological analysis revealed 2 CIN3, 2 carcinomas and 5 CIN1. OncoE6 called two out of the three HPV 16 or 18 associated CIN3+ lesions.

conclusionsThe findings suggest that self-administered sample collection in combination with OncoE6 Test is feasible in this population. This could enable expanded screening coverage while ensuring a high specificity which is imperative given the remote geographic location, since women bearing abnormal test results would necessitate travel and logistical burden to access colposcopy and treatment.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultBrazilColposcopyDNA-Binding ProteinsDNA, ViralEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHuman papillomavirus 16Human papillomavirus 18HumansMiddle AgedOncogene Proteins, ViralPapillomavirus InfectionsRepressor ProteinsRural PopulationDNA-Binding ProteinsDNA, ViralE6 protein, Human papillomavirus type 16E6 protein, Human papillomavirus type 18Oncogene Proteins, ViralRepressor Proteins

Identifiers

PMID30036381
PMCPMC6056043
OpenAlexW2883433758

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.