Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30036368›Full record

ArticlePloS one2018

Jugglers and tightrope walkers: The challenge of delivering quality community pharmacy services.

Margaret C Watson, Zoe C Skea

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Antimicrobial dispensing process in community pharmacies: a scoping review.Antimicrobial resistance and infection control · 2022
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Quality indicators and community pharmacy services: a scoping review.The International journal of pharmacy practice · 2019
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Margaret C WatsonDepartment of Pharmacy and Pharmacology, University of Bath, Claverton Down, Bath, England.ORCID 0000-0002-8198-9273
Zoe C SkeaHealth Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Foresterhill Campus, Aberdeen, United Kingdom.

Funding

Chief Scientist Office HSRU2
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThis is the first exploration of service providers' attitudes and beliefs of quality and quality improvement in the community pharmacy setting in the UK. MATERIALS AND

methodsA series of interviews and focus groups was conducted with stakeholders from the pharmacy profession in the UK. Interviews were semi-structured and conducted face-to-face or by telephone. Focus groups were conducted with naturally-occurring groups i.e. at pharmacy conferences. Interviews and focus groups were audio-recorded, transcribed and analysed systematically using an interpretive approach.

resultsForty-two individuals participated across four focus groups and four interviews. A maximum variation sample was achieved in terms of pharmacist and pharmacy characteristics. Participants were generally positive about the need for quality and quality improvement and provided multifaceted and interlinked interpretations of quality and acknowledged its dynamic nature "quality moves forward". The challenge of standardising practice whilst providing person-centred care emerged: "you don't want to lose the personal touch, but you can't have people having a variable experience and one day it's fantastic and the next day it isn't". A variety of quality measurement methods were identified including direct observation (by internal and external agents) and feedback (mystery shoppers, colleagues, regulatory inspectors, service users), suggesting that standardisation was also needed in terms of future quality measurement. There was a tendency to report negative events as triggers for improvement. Future initiatives could adopt more positive approaches including positive deviants "There's nothing more powerful than people who've come up with something really good sharing it with their other colleagues". DISCUSSION: The results are being used to develop and evaluate future quality improvement initiatives in this sector. These are likely to be targeted at organisational, team and individual levels.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelQuality ImprovementCommunity Pharmacy ServicesFemaleFocus GroupsHumansMalePharmaciesPharmacistsUnited Kingdom

Identifiers

PMID30036368
PMCPMC6056049

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.