Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30036365›Full record

ArticlePloS one2018

Willingness to participate in HIV research at the end of life (EOL).

Katya Prakash, Sara Gianella, Karine Dubé, Jeff Taylor, GaYoung Lee, Davey M Smith

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Katya PrakashDivision of Infectious Diseases, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California, United States of America.
Sara GianellaDivision of Infectious Diseases, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-9927-0849
Karine DubéUniversity of North Carolina Gillings School of Global Public Health, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America.
Jeff TaylorCommunity Advisory Board (CAB) AntiViral Research Center (AVRC) San Diego, San Diego, California, United States of America.
GaYoung LeeJohns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Department of Molecular Microbiology, Immunology, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America.
Davey M SmithDivision of Infectious Diseases, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California, United States of America.

Funding

Virology CoreP30AI027763 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI STEVEN Grant DEEKS · 1988 to 2026
$93.6M
VirologyP30AI036214 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI Maile Ann Young Karris · 1994 to 2026
$78.4M
STRUCTURAL NEUROIMAGING COREP30MH062512 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI DAVID J MOORE · 2001 to 2026
$50.4M
Using NK Cells to eliminate the latent HIV reservoirU19AI096113 · NIAID · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI LUCIW, PAUL · 2011 to 2015
$39.5M
San Diego Clinical and Translational Research InstituteUL1TR000100 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI FIRESTEIN, GARY S · 2012 to 2015
$19.7M
RESEARCH IN INFECTIOUS DISEASEST32AI007036 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI NIZET, VICTOR · 1985 to 2025
$9.2M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000100NIAID NIH HHS P30 AI027763NIAID NIH HHS P30 AI036214NIAID NIH HHS T32 AI007036NIAID NIH HHS U19 AI096113NIMH NIH HHS P30 MH062512
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAnimal models have been vital for scientific discovery but have limitations, especially in infectious disease research. It is essential to develop a means to study these diseases in human models. We hypothesized that altruistic people would willingly participate in research near the end-of-life (EOL), for the benefit of science and to provide one last gift to society. METHODOLOGY: Two surveys were administered to 377 self-reported HIV-negative and 96 HIV-positive individuals. Hypothetical questions assessed their willingness to participate in altruistic research in the last 6 months of life, which might result in a shortened lifespan or physical discomforts. The self-reported HIV-negative group was also asked about willingness to be exposed to infectious pathogens for the sake of research.

resultsAlmost all responders expressed willingness to participate in research at the EOL, regardless of HIV-status. The majority of participants were willing to endure physical discomfort for the sake of research. 'Blood draws' was identified as the most tolerable physical discomfort (>70% in both groups). In both groups, >60% were willing to shorten their lifespans for the sake of research. A third of the self-reported HIV-negative group expressed willingness to be exposed to at least one infectious agent to participate in EOL research.

conclusionsOur exploratory study demonstrates that people would welcome the opportunity to participate in altruistic research near the EOL. Such research could greatly impact the way infectious disease research is conducted. This study is limited however by its hypothetical nature. Further research is necessary to confirm this interest in those with terminal illness before any further clinical research effort at the EOL can be performed.

Indexed as

Health Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticePatient ParticipationResearchTerminal CareAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHIV InfectionsHumansMaleMiddle AgedSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID30036365
PMCPMC6056048

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.