Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30036219›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of gynecological cancer : official journal of the International Gynecological Cancer Society2018

Predictors of Unplanned Reoperation for Ovarian Cancer Patients From the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Database.

Michael D Toboni, Haller J Smith, Sejong Bae, J Michael Straughn, Charles A Leath

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of gynecological cancer : official journal of the International Gynecological Cancer Society, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact, top 86% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Michael D ToboniDepartment of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Divisions of.
Haller J SmithGynecologic Oncology and.
Sejong BaePreventive Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL.
J Michael StraughnGynecologic Oncology and.
Charles A LeathGynecologic Oncology and.
Gynecologic Oncology Group · USUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham · US

Funding

XRAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA013148 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI MICHAEL JAMES BERTRAM · 1985 to 2026
$165.9M
NCTN Deep South Research ConsortiumU10CA180855 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI BJORNSTI, MARY-ANN, FALKSON, CARLA I · 2014 to 2018
$2.6M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA013148NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180855
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe aim of this study was to determine preoperative risk factors associated with unplanned reoperation within 30 days for patients undergoing major surgery for primary ovarian cancer using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database.

methodsWe conducted a retrospective cohort study utilizing the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database to identify patients undergoing primary ovarian cancer surgery from 2012 to 2014. Patients who had a reoperation within 30 days of their primary surgery were identified. Demographics and clinical covariates were calculated. Adjusted odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using univariate and multivariate logistic regression approaches to assess the association.

resultsA total of 4260 patients were identified during the study period. One hundred forty-eight patients (3.5%) underwent a reoperation within 30 days of their primary surgery. In univariate analysis, preoperative creatinine 1.5 mg/dL or greater (P = 0.010), smoking (P = 0.003), and both insulin-dependent (P = 0.029) and non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (P = 0.048) were predictive of a reoperation. Multivariate analysis noted that smoking (OR, 1.94; 95% CI, 1.26-2.99), insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (OR, 2.18; 95% CI, 1.08-4.40), non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (OR, 1.65; 95% CI, 1.01-2.72), and preoperative creatinine (OR, 2.65; 95% CI, 1.26-5.58) were predictive of a reoperation. Age 50 to 60 years was protective against reoperation when compared with age younger than 50 years (OR, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.32-0.90).

conclusionsEfforts to reduce reoperation rates should focus on identifying high-risk patients by utilizing objective preoperative data. Optimizing their medical status prior to surgery may decrease the reoperation rate in patients with ovarian cancer, thereby improving outcomes and providing a probable cost benefit.

Indexed as

AgedCohort StudiesDatabases, FactualFemaleHumansLaparotomyMiddle AgedOvarian NeoplasmsReoperationRetrospective StudiesSurgical Oncology

Identifiers

PMID30036219
PMCPMC6108931
OpenAlexW2884009218

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.