Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30035218›Full record

ArticleScience advances2018

Robust estimates of a high

Robin S Waples, Peter M Grewe, Mark W Bravington, Richard Hillary, Pierre Feutry

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Science advances, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
8.2field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 63 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Effective population size and NBMC ecology and evolution · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Ancient DNA suggests a historical demographic decline and genetic erosion in the Atlantic bluefin tuna.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  7. Temporal Variability in Effective Size (Molecular ecology resources · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Unraveling the Complexity of theEvolutionary applications · 2024
    Review
  11. Article
  12. TheEvolutionary applications · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Robin S WaplesNorthwest Fisheries Science Center, National Marine Fisheries Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Seattle, WA 98112, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3362-7590
Peter M GreweCommonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO) Oceans and Atmosphere, G.P.O. Box 1538, Hobart 7001, Tasmania, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-7111-4150
Mark W BravingtonCommonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO) Oceans and Atmosphere, G.P.O. Box 1538, Hobart 7001, Tasmania, Australia.
Richard HillaryCommonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO) Oceans and Atmosphere, G.P.O. Box 1538, Hobart 7001, Tasmania, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-0795-5339
Pierre FeutryCommonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO) Oceans and Atmosphere, G.P.O. Box 1538, Hobart 7001, Tasmania, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-8492-5382
CSIRO Oceans and Atmosphere · AUNOAA National Marine Fisheries Service · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genetic studies of several marine species with high fecundity have produced "tiny" estimates (≤10

Indexed as

AnimalsGenetic LociLinkage DisequilibriumPopulation DensityPredatory BehaviorTuna

Identifiers

PMID30035218
PMCPMC6051734
OpenAlexW2884427745

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.