ArticleProceedings of the International Symposium of Human Factors and Ergonomics in Healthcare. International Symposium of Human Factors and Ergonomics in Healthcare2017
CLUSTERING AND PRIORITIZING PATIENT SAFETY ISSUES DURING EHR IMPLEMENTATION AND UPGRADES IN HOSPITAL SETTINGS.
Article in Proceedings of the International Symposium of Human Factors and Ergonomics in Healthcare. International Symposium of Human Factors and Ergonomics in Healthcare, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Association between Electronic Health Record Implementations and Hospital-Acquired Conditions in Pediatric Hospitals.Applied clinical informatics · 2023Article
- Automatic classification of scanned electronic health record documents.International journal of medical informatics · 2020Article
- Translating, Adapting and Validating the Revised MISSCARE Survey for Use in Norwegian Hospitals-A Pilot Study.SAGE open nursingArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Our aim was to elicit, label, and prioritize clusters of de-identified patient safety issues experienced during the implementation and upgrade installations of Electronic Health Records (EHRs) in hospitals. Conference participants included clinical personnel (physicians, nurses, pharmacists), human factors experts, patient safety experts, information technology experts from vendors and hospitals, academic experts, graduate students, and other attendees. De-identified reports of patient safety issues were shared via share4safety@gmail.com by conference and non-conference attendees before and during a 90-minute session featured at the Human Factors in Healthcare International Symposium on March 8, 2017. One submitted example of a reported patient safety issue was provided to the group. During the session, each attendee shared with a partner five concerns and identified their top concern. Subsequently, each two-person group shared with the larger group these issues, which were written by a facilitator onto sticky paper and placed on the walls. The issues were grouped using pre-defined categories and new categories were identified. Next, each participant voted for the highest priority cluster and/or individual patient safety issue using stickers. This paper reports the results of the interactive session, including the labeled and prioritized clusters and illustrative examples for each cluster. These clusters may inform reporting systems and quality improvement initiatives with health information technology where choices made during implementation and upgrades as well as design flaws with EHR technology both contribute and interact to produce potential patient safety issues.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.