Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30035028›Full record

ArticleJournal of orthopaedic translation2018

Are patients with knee osteoarthritis and patients with knee joint replacement as physically active as healthy persons?

Rikke Daugaard, Marianne Tjur, Maik Sliepen, Matthijs Lipperts, Bernd Grimm, Inger Mechlenburg

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of orthopaedic translation, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Knee osteoarthritis pendulum therapy:Journal of orthopaedic translation · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Rikke DaugaardOrthopaedic Research Unit, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Marianne TjurOrthopaedic Research Unit, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Maik SliepenInstitut für Experimentelle Muskuloskelettale Medizin, Universitätsklinikum Münster, Münster, Germany.
Matthijs LippertsDepartment of Medical Information and Communication and Technology, St. Anna Hospital, Geldrop, The Netherlands.
Bernd GrimmAHORSE Research Foundation, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Zuyderland Medical Center, Heerlen, The Netherlands.
Inger MechlenburgOrthopaedic Research Unit, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Aarhus University Hospital · DKSt. Anna Ziekenhuis · NLUniversity Hospital Münster · DEZuyderland Medisch Centrum · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIt is well documented that patients with knee osteoarthritis (KOA) suffer from reduced physical function and that function of the affected knee is improved after knee joint replacement (KJR). However, it remains uncertain whether patients with KOA are less physically active than healthy people and whether patients increase their level of physical activity after surgery to a level comparable with that of healthy people. The aim of this study was to examine whether patients with KOA are less physically active than healthy participants and whether patients who have undergone KJR show an increased activity and achieve the same level of physical activity as healthy participants 5 years postoperatively.

methodsFifty-four patients with KOA (29 women; mean age 62 ± 8.6; mean body mass index (BMI) 27 ± 5), 52 patients who had KJR due to KOA 5 years earlier (26 women; mean age 66 ± 7.2; mean BMI 30 ± 5) and 171 healthy participants (76 women, mean age 64 ± 9.7, mean BMI 26 ± 5) were included in this cross-sectional study. The level of physical activity was measured over a mean period of 5.5 days with a triaxial accelerometer mounted on the thigh. Number of daily steps, number of daily short walking bouts of <10 s duration and number of daily transfers from sitting to standing position were recorded. Data were analysed using two sample

resultsPatients with KOA did not differ significantly from healthy participants regarding daily steps (+321,

conclusionPatients with KOA and KJR showed no significant reduction in number of daily step counts and transfers from sitting to standing position when compared with matched healthy controls. However, the number of short walking bouts was reduced in patients with KOA and by twice as much in patients with KJR. This indicates that KOA and treatment with KJR hardly affect health-related general activity but do affect specific physical activity behaviour potentially indicative of KOA or post-KJR functional limitations. THE TRANSLATIONAL POTENTIAL OF THIS ARTICLE: Activity monitoring with an accelerometer-based method gives insights into health-related general activity levels such as total daily steps and specific parameters such as short walking bouts, which may serve as an objective outcome measure in clinical practice.

Indexed as

AccelerometryActivity monitoringKnee osteoarthritisKnee replacementPhysical activity

Identifiers

PMID30035028
PMCPMC6042525
OpenAlexW2795821640

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.