Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30034925›Full record

ArticleProceedings. IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine2017

Automatic Methods to Extract New York Heart Association Classification from Clinical Notes.

Rui Zhang, Sisi Ma, Liesa Shanahan, Jessica Munroe, Sarah Horn, Stuart Speedie

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings. IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Rui ZhangInstitute for Health Informatics, and College of Pharmacy, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Sisi MaInstitute for Health Informatics, and Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Liesa ShanahanMedtronic, Inc., Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Jessica MunroeMedtronic, Inc., Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Sarah HornMedtronic, Inc., Minneapolis MN, USA.
Stuart SpeedieInstitute for Health Informatics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.

Funding

University of Minnesota Clinical and Translational Science Institute (UMN CTSI)UL1TR000114 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI BLAZAR, BRUCE R · 2012 to 2015
$35.0M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000114
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy (CRT) is an established pacing therapy for heart failure patients. The New York Heart Association (NYHA) classification is often used as a measure of a patient's response to CRT. Identifying NYHA class for heart failure patients in an electronic health record (EHR) consistently, over time, can provide better understanding of the progression of heart failure and assessment of CRT response and effectiveness. However, NYHA is rarely stored in EHR structured data such information is often documented in unstructured clinical notes. In this study, we thus investigated the use of natural language processing (NLP) methods to identify NYHA classification from clinical notes. We collected 6,174 clinical notes that were matched with hospital-specific custom NYHA class diagnosis codes. Machine-learning based methods performed similar with a rule-based method. The best machine-learning method, support vector machine with n-gram features, performed the best (93% F-measure). Further validation of the findings is required.

Indexed as

Clinical NotesElectronic Health RecordsNatural Language ProcessingNew York Heart Association (NYHA)

Identifiers

PMID30034925
PMCPMC6051704

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.