Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30034911›Full record

ArticleNational science review2018

Learning causality and causality-related learning: some recent progress.

Kun Zhang, Bernhard Schölkopf, Peter Spirtes, Clark Glymour

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in National science review, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Synthetic data generation with probabilistic Bayesian Networks.Mathematical biosciences and engineering : MBE · 2021
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Closed-Form Results for Prior Constraints in Sum-Product Networks.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Generalized Score Functions for Causal Discovery.KDD : proceedings. International Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining · 2018
    Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Kun ZhangDepartment of Philosophy, Carnegie Mellon University, USA.
Bernhard SchölkopfMax Planck Institute for Intelligent Systems, Germany.
Peter SpirtesDepartment of Philosophy, Carnegie Mellon University, USA.
Clark GlymourDepartment of Philosophy, Carnegie Mellon University, USA.

Funding

TrainingU54HG008540 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI BAHAR, IVET, BERG, JEREMY M · 2014 to 2018
$12.8M
Supplement Plan for EFFECTIVE CONNECTIVITY IN BRAIN NETWORKS: Detecting network disruption in Alzheimeir's using sub-second temporal resolutionR01EB022858 · NIBIB · RUTGERS THE STATE UNIV OF NJ NEWARK · PI HANSON, STEPHEN JOSÉ · 2016 to 2018
$1.6M
INTEGRATIVE GRAPHICAL MODELS FOR LARGE MULTI-MODAL BIOMEDICAL DATAR01LM012087 · NLM · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI BENOS, PANAGIOTIS V, GLYMOUR, CLARK · 2015 to 2018
$1.3M
NHGRI NIH HHS U54 HG008540NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB022858NLM NIH HHS R01 LM012087
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Identifiers

PMID30034911
PMCPMC6051411

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.