Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30034776›Full record

ArticleTherapeutic advances in drug safety2018

Qualitative exploration of practices to prevent medication errors in neonatal intensive care units: a focus group study.

Rikke Mie Rishoej, Henriette Lai Nielsen, Stina Maria Strzelec, Jane Fritsdal Refer, Sanne Allermann Beck, Hanne Marie Gramstrup, Henrik Thybo Christesen, Lene Juel Kjeldsen, Jesper Hallas, Anna Birna Almarsdóttir

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Therapeutic advances in drug safety, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Rikke Mie RishoejClinical Pharmacology and Pharmacy, Department of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, J. B. Winsløws Vej 19, 2. 5000 Odense C, Denmark.
Henriette Lai NielsenDepartment of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
Stina Maria StrzelecDepartment of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
Jane Fritsdal ReferHans Christian Andersen Children's Hospital, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.
Sanne Allermann BeckDepartment of Neonatology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Hanne Marie GramstrupDepartment of Paediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Henrik Thybo ChristesenHans Christian Andersen Children's Hospital, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
Lene Juel KjeldsenAmgros I/S, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Jesper HallasDepartment of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
Anna Birna AlmarsdóttirDepartment of Pharmacy, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
University of Southern Denmark · DKOdense University Hospital · DKAarhus University Hospital · DKCopenhagen University Hospital · DKUniversity of Copenhagen · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMedication errors (MEs) in neonates are frequent and associated with increased potential for harm compared with adults. The effect of learning from reported MEs is potentially lacking due to underreporting, lack of feedback and missing actions to improve medication safety. A new approach involving positive recognition of current and future strategies may facilitate greater exploration of how to improve medication safety in neonates. We aimed to explore current and potential future practices to prevent MEs in neonatal intensive care units (NICUs).

methodsFocus group interviews of physicians and nurses were conducted at three Danish NICUs. Participants were included if they had at least 1 month of working experience and provided direct patient care. A semistructured interview guide involving three questions was used: (a) how do you feel about discussing prevention of MEs? (b) how do you currently prevent MEs from occurring? and (c) how can we become better at preventing MEs in the future? Content analysis was used to identify themes in the interviews.

resultsParticipants commented that MEs still occur and that action must be taken to improve medication safety. Current practices to prevent MEs involved technology, procedures, education, skills and hospital pharmacy services. Potential future practices to prevent MEs included customizing the computerized physician order entry systems to support optimal prescribing, standardizing the double-check process, training of calculation skills and teamwork and increased use of hospital pharmacy services.

conclusionsSeveral current and potential future practices to reduce MEs in NICUs were identified, highlighting the complexity of MEs. Our findings support an interdisciplinary multifaceted intervention involving both technical and nontechnical elements to improve medication safety in NICUs.

Indexed as

hospitalmedication errorspaediatricsprevention strategies

Identifiers

PMID30034776
PMCPMC6048629
OpenAlexW2800246650

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.