Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30034536›Full record

ReviewTherapeutic advances in neurological disorders2018

Primary angiitis of the central nervous system: diagnosis and treatment.

Carolin Beuker, Antje Schmidt, Daniel Strunk, Peter B Sporns, Heinz Wiendl, Sven G Meuth, Jens Minnerup

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Therapeutic advances in neurological disorders, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 56 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
56citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

56 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Primary Angiitis of the CNS: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Neurology(R) neuroimmunology & neuroinflammation · 2021
    Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. MR findings of intravascular large B-cell lymphoma of the central nervous system: report of three cases.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Carolin BeukerDepartment of Neurology, University Hospital Münster, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1, Münster, D-48149, Germany.
Antje SchmidtDepartment of Neurology, University of Münster, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1, Münster, Germany.
Daniel StrunkDepartment of Neurology, University of Münster, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1, Münster, Germany.
Peter B SpornsDepartment of Clinical Radiology, University of Münster, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1, Münster, Germany.
Heinz WiendlDepartment of Neurology, University of Münster, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1, Münster, Germany.
Sven G MeuthDepartment of Neurology, University of Münster, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1, Münster, Germany.
Jens MinnerupDepartment of Neurology, University of Münster, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1, Münster, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Primary angiitis of the central nervous system (PACNS) represents a rare inflammatory disease affecting the brain and spinal cord. Stroke, encephalopathy, headache and seizures are major clinical manifestations. The diagnosis of PACNS is based on the combination of clinical presentation, imaging findings (magnetic resonance imaging and angiography), brain biopsy, and laboratory and cerebral spinal fluid (CSF) values. PACNS can either be confirmed by magnetic resonance angiography (MRA)/conventional angiography or tissue biopsy showing the presence of typical histopathological patterns. Identification of PACNS mimics is often challenging in clinical practice, but crucial to avoid far-reaching treatment decisions. In view of the severity of the disease, with considerable morbidity and mortality, early recognition and treatment initiation is necessary. Due to the rareness and heterogeneity of the disease, there is a lack of randomized data on treatment strategies. Retrospective studies suggest the combined administration of cyclophosphamide and glucocorticoids as induction therapy. Immunosuppressants such as azathioprine, methotrexate or mycophenolate mofetil are often applied for maintenance therapy. In addition, the beneficial effects of two biological agents (anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody rituximab and tumour necrosis factor-α blocker) have been reported. Nevertheless, diagnosis and treatment is still a clinical challenge, and further insights into the immunopathogenesis of PACNS are required to improve the diagnosis and management of patients. The present review provides a comprehensive overview of diagnostics, differential diagnoses, and therapeutic approaches of adult PACNS.

Indexed as

diagnosisinflammationprimary angiitis of the central nervous systemstroketreatment

Identifiers

PMID30034536
PMCPMC6048610

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.