ArticleStatistical modelling2017
Rejoinder to statistical contributions to bioinformatics: Design, modelling, structure learning and Integration.
Article in Statistical modelling, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Systematic Evaluation of Normalization Methods for Glycomics Data Based on Performance of Network Inference.Metabolites · 2020Article
- Detection of suspicious interactions of spiking covariates in methylation data.BMC bioinformatics · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
We thank the discussants for their kind comments and their insightful analysis and discussion that has substantially added to the contribution of this issue. Overall, it seems the discussants have affirmed many of our primary points, and have also raised a number of other relevant and important issues that we did not emphasize in the paper. Several common threads emerged from these discussions, including the importance of software development, appropriate dissemination, and close collaboration with biomedical scientists and technology experts in order to ensure our work is relevant and impactful. Each discussant also mentioned other areas of bioinformatics that have been impacted by statistical researchers that we did not highlight in the original paper. In response, we will first summarize discuss these general themes, and then respond to specific comments of each discussant, and finally talk about the additional areas of bioinformatics impacted by statisticians that were mentioned by the reviewers.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.