Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30034172›Full record

ArticleVeterinary world2018

Protective role of

Suman Verma, Mayank Rawat, Sanjay Kumawat, Salauddin Qureshi, Gulam Mohd, Ashok Kumar Tiwari

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Veterinary world, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Use of recombinantVeterinary world · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Suman VermaDivision of Biological Standardization, Indian Veterinary Research Institute, Izatnagar - 243 122, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Mayank RawatDivision of Biological Standardization, Indian Veterinary Research Institute, Izatnagar - 243 122, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Sanjay KumawatDivision of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Indian Veterinary Research Institute, Izatnagar - 243 122, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Salauddin QureshiDivision of Biological Standardization, Indian Veterinary Research Institute, Izatnagar - 243 122, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Gulam MohdDivision of Biological Standardization, Indian Veterinary Research Institute, Izatnagar - 243 122, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Ashok Kumar TiwariDivision of Biological Standardization, Indian Veterinary Research Institute, Izatnagar - 243 122, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Indian Veterinary Research Institute · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimThe major objective of the investigation was to evaluate the hitherto uncharacterized potential of MATERIALS AND

methods

resultA dose-dependent protective response to immune mice serum was observed in both experimental models though the values of PI of mice were higher than those obtained for guinea pigs. The PI values in mice passively immunized with 50 IU or 25 IU antibodies were 1.38 and 0.69, respectively. In guinea pigs, however, animals passively immunized with 50 IU or 25 IU antibodies showed PI values equivalent to 0.79 and 0.41, respectively.

conclusionThe observations support our hypothesis that the presence of antibodies inhibits the initial multiplication and eventual colonization of systemic organs by

Indexed as

brucellosishumoral immunitymicepassive protectionprotective index

Identifiers

PMID30034172
PMCPMC6048087
OpenAlexW2808456892

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.