Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30033593›Full record

ArticleHepatology (Baltimore, Md.)2019

Inhibition of Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 5: A Strategy to Improve Sorafenib Response in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Therapy.

Maximilian A Ardelt, Thomas Fröhlich, Emanuele Martini, Martin Müller, Veronika Kanitz, Carina Atzberger, Petra Cantonati, Martina Meßner, Laura Posselt, Thorsten Lehr and 12 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Hepatology (Baltimore, Md.), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed
7.3field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 67 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. CDK5 targets p21Molecular medicine reports · 2025
    Article
  3. CDK5: Insights into its roles in diseases.Molecular biology reports · 2025
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Advanced Nanotheranostics of CRISPR/Cas for Viral Hepatitis and Hepatocellular Carcinoma.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2021
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. CRISPR/Cas9 in Gastrointestinal Malignancies.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2021
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors at 9 institutions in 4 countries.

Maximilian A ArdeltDepartment of Pharmacy, Pharmaceutical Biology, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Thomas FröhlichLaboratory for Functional Genome Analysis, LAFUGA, Gene Centre, University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Emanuele MartiniIFOM-FIRC Institute of Molecular Oncology, Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy, Milan, Italy.
Martin MüllerDepartment of Pharmacy, Pharmaceutical Biology, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Veronika KanitzInstitute of Pathology, Ludwig Maximilians University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Carina AtzbergerDepartment of Pharmacy, Pharmaceutical Biology, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Petra CantonatiInstitute of Pharmacy, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria.
Martina MeßnerDepartment of Pharmacy, Pharmaceutical Biology, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Laura PosseltCenter of Integrated Protein Science Munich (CIPS-M) and Division of Clinical Pharmacology, Department of Internal Medicine IV, Klinikum der Universität München, Munich, Germany.
Thorsten LehrClinical Pharmacy, Saarland University, Saarbrücken, Germany.
Jan-Georg WojtyniakClinical Pharmacy, Saarland University, Saarbrücken, Germany.
Melanie UlrichDepartment of Pharmacy, Pharmaceutical Biology, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Georg J ArnoldLaboratory for Functional Genome Analysis, LAFUGA, Gene Centre, University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Lars KönigCenter of Integrated Protein Science Munich (CIPS-M) and Division of Clinical Pharmacology, Department of Internal Medicine IV, Klinikum der Universität München, Munich, Germany.
Dario ParazzoliIFOM-FIRC Institute of Molecular Oncology, Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy, Milan, Italy.
Stefan ZahlerDepartment of Pharmacy, Pharmaceutical Biology, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Simon RothenfußerCenter of Integrated Protein Science Munich (CIPS-M) and Division of Clinical Pharmacology, Department of Internal Medicine IV, Klinikum der Universität München, Munich, Germany.
Doris MayrInstitute of Pathology, Ludwig Maximilians University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Alexander GerbesDepartment of Medicine 2, Liver Center Munich, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Giorgio ScitaIFOM-FIRC Institute of Molecular Oncology, Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy, Milan, Italy.
Angelika M VollmarDepartment of Pharmacy, Pharmaceutical Biology, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Johanna PachmayrDepartment of Pharmacy, Pharmaceutical Biology, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München · DECenter for Integrated Protein Science Munich · DEMunich School of Philosophy · DEParacelsus Medical University · ATFIRC Institute of Molecular Oncology · ITGenetic Analysis (Norway) · NOSaarland University · DEMünchen Klinik · DEUniversity of Milan · IT

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft VO376/17-1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Therapeutic options for patients with advanced-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) are very limited. The only approved first-line treatment is the multi-tyrosine kinase inhibitor sorafenib, which shows low response rates and severe side effects. In particular, the compensatory activation of growth factor receptors leads to chemoresistance and limits the clinical impact of sorafenib. However, combination approaches to improve sorafenib have failed. Here we investigate the inhibition of cyclin-dependent kinase 5 (Cdk5) as a promising combination strategy to improve sorafenib response in HCC. Combination of sorafenib with Cdk5 inhibition (genetic knockdown by short hairpin RNA or CRISPR/Cas9 and pharmacologic inhibition) synergistically impaired HCC progression in vitro and in vivo by inhibiting both tumor cell proliferation and migration. Importantly, these effects were mediated by a mechanism for Cdk5: A liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry-based proteomic approach revealed that Cdk5 inhibition interferes with intracellular trafficking, a process crucial for cellular homeostasis and growth factor receptor signaling. Cdk5 inhibition resulted in an accumulation of enlarged vesicles and respective cargos in the perinuclear region, considerably impairing the extent and quality of growth factor receptor signaling. Thereby, Cdk5 inhibition offers a comprehensive approach to globally disturb growth factor receptor signaling that is superior to specific inhibition of individual growth factor receptors. Conclusion: Cdk5 inhibition represents an effective approach to improve sorafenib response and to prevent sorafenib treatment escape in HCC. Notably, Cdk5 is an addressable target frequently overexpressed in HCC, and with Dinaciclib, a clinically tested Cdk5 inhibitor is readily available. Thus, our study provides evidence for clinically evaluating the combination of sorafenib and Dinaciclib to improve the therapeutic situation for patients with advanced-stage HCC.

Indexed as

AnimalsCarcinoma, HepatocellularCyclin-Dependent Kinase 5FemaleHumansLiver NeoplasmsMiceProtein Kinase InhibitorsSorafenibTreatment OutcomeTumor Cells, CulturedCyclin-Dependent Kinase 5Protein Kinase InhibitorsSorafenib

Identifiers

PMID30033593
PMCPMC6590289
OpenAlexW2883772985

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.