Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30033540›Full record

Trial reportJournal of anatomy2018

Feasibility, accuracy and safety of a percutaneous fine-needle biopsy technique to obtain qualitative muscle samples of the lumbar multifidus and erector spinae muscle in persons with low back pain.

Anouk Agten, Jonas Verbrugghe, Sjoerd Stevens, Lukas Boomgaert, Bert O Eijnde, Annick Timmermans, Frank Vandenabeele

Open access · bronzeAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of anatomy, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Anouk AgtenRehabilitation Research Center, Faculty of Medicine and Life Sciences, BIOMED Biomedical Research Institute, UHasselt - Hasselt University, Diepenbeek, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0003-3859-6578
Jonas VerbruggheRehabilitation Research Center, Faculty of Medicine and Life Sciences, BIOMED Biomedical Research Institute, UHasselt - Hasselt University, Diepenbeek, Belgium.
Sjoerd StevensRehabilitation Research Center, Faculty of Medicine and Life Sciences, BIOMED Biomedical Research Institute, UHasselt - Hasselt University, Diepenbeek, Belgium.
Lukas BoomgaertDepartment of Radiology, Jessa Hospital, Hasselt, Belgium.
Bert O EijndeRehabilitation Research Center, Faculty of Medicine and Life Sciences, BIOMED Biomedical Research Institute, UHasselt - Hasselt University, Diepenbeek, Belgium.
Annick TimmermansRehabilitation Research Center, Faculty of Medicine and Life Sciences, BIOMED Biomedical Research Institute, UHasselt - Hasselt University, Diepenbeek, Belgium.
Frank VandenabeeleRehabilitation Research Center, Faculty of Medicine and Life Sciences, BIOMED Biomedical Research Institute, UHasselt - Hasselt University, Diepenbeek, Belgium.
Hasselt University · BEJessa Hospital · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The lumbar muscular system, in particular the lumbar multifidus muscle (LM) and the erector spinae muscle (ES), plays an important role in stabilizing and mobilizing the lumbar spine. Based on the topography, the lumbar paraspinal muscles can be classified into local and global muscles. LM is part of the local system, whereas ES is part of the global system. Therefore, it is interesting to investigate the muscle fibre type composition in both muscles. There is accumulating evidence that nonspecific chronic low back pain is associated with lumbar muscle dysfunction. To further elucidate this lumbar paraspinal muscle dysfunction, it is important to understand the structural characteristics of individual muscle fibres of LM and ES. Muscle fibre type composition can be investigated in muscle tissue samples. So far, muscle samples are taken by using invasive procedures that are not well tolerated. The aim of this article was to evaluate the feasibility, accuracy and safety of a percutaneous fine-needle biopsy technique to obtain muscle samples from LM and ES in persons with nonspecific chronic low back pain and to evaluate the feasibility of performing immunofluorescence analysis of myosin heavy chain isoform expression to investigate muscle fibre type composition. Preliminary investigations in cadavers were performed to determine the optimal vertebral level and puncture site to obtain muscle samples of LM and ES through a single skin puncture. In 15 persons with nonspecific chronic low back pain, muscle samples of LM and ES were taken under local anaesthesia with the percutaneous fine-needle biopsy technique, preceded by determination of the puncture site with ultrasonography. Muscle fibre type composition was investigated using immunofluorescence analysis of myosin heavy chain expression. The subjects reported little or no pain and were willing to repeat the procedure. The obtained muscle tissue contained transverse-sectioned muscle fibres in which muscle fibre contractile characteristics of the paraspinal muscles could be evaluated with immunofluorescence analysis of the myosin heavy chains. We can conclude that percutaneous microbiopsy appears to be feasible and accurate, and safe to use to obtain muscle tissue from the paraspinal muscles. The use of ultrasonography to determine the puncture site is necessary to ensure biopsy of the correct muscles and to ensure the safety of the procedure.

Indexed as

AdultBiopsy, Fine-NeedleFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansLow Back PainLumbosacral RegionMaleMiddle AgedParaspinal Muscleslumbar paraspinal musclesmuscle architecturemuscle biopsymuscle fibre characteristicsmuscle fibre typingmuscle morphology

Identifiers

PMID30033540
PMCPMC6131974
OpenAlexW2884831143

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.