Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30033502›Full record

ArticleNaunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology2018

A comparison between the effects of ochratoxin A and aristolochic acid on the inflammation and oxidative stress in the liver and kidney of weanling piglets.

D E Marin, G C Pistol, M Gras, M Palade, I Taranu

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Risks for animal health related to the presence of ochratoxin A (OTA) in feed.EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Risk assessment of ochratoxin A in food.EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

D E MarinLaboratory of Animal Biology, National Institute for Research and Development for Biology and Animal Nutrition, Calea Bucuresti no. 1, Balotesti, 077015, Ilfov, Romania. daniela.marin@ibna.ro.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0518-246X
G C PistolLaboratory of Animal Biology, National Institute for Research and Development for Biology and Animal Nutrition, Calea Bucuresti no. 1, Balotesti, 077015, Ilfov, Romania.
M GrasLaboratory of Animal Biology, National Institute for Research and Development for Biology and Animal Nutrition, Calea Bucuresti no. 1, Balotesti, 077015, Ilfov, Romania.
M PaladeLaboratory of Animal Biology, National Institute for Research and Development for Biology and Animal Nutrition, Calea Bucuresti no. 1, Balotesti, 077015, Ilfov, Romania.
I TaranuLaboratory of Animal Biology, National Institute for Research and Development for Biology and Animal Nutrition, Calea Bucuresti no. 1, Balotesti, 077015, Ilfov, Romania.
National Research Development Institute for Animal Biology and Nutrition · RO

Funding

Romanian Ministry of Resaerc Nucleus Program thought the project PN 16 41 0202
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ochratoxin A (OTA) and aristolochic acid (AA) are toxins that can frequently contaminate cereals and cereals-based products. The present study has realized a comparison between the effect of OTA and AA on oxidative stress and inflammation in both the liver and kidney of pigs as major organs involved in the metabolism of xenobiotics. Fifteen pigs (five pigs/group) were randomly distributed in three groups (control, OTA, and AA) and were fed diets contaminated or not with 250 μg toxin/kg for 28 days. Consumption of a diet contaminated with OTA and AA increase the concentration of serum creatinine as compared with the control group. The exposure of piglets to AA decrease the activity of enzymes involved in the oxidative stress response: catalase (CAT), superoxide dismutase (SOD), and glutathione peroxydase (GPx) in the liver and kidney while OTA decrease only GPx activity and only in the kidney. The consumption of the diets contaminated with AA increase in the liver the synthesis of tumor necrosis factor (TNF) alpha, interferon (IFN) gamma, Interleukin (IL)-1 beta, IL-6, and IL-8 synthesis, while IL-4 was increase by OTA and decreased by AA. In the kidney, AA increase the TNF alpha and IFN gamma synthesis as compared with the control. In conclusion, our results have shown that beside the alteration of serum markers, much known indicators for nephropathy, OTA and AA can induce inflammation and oxidative stress. In conclusion, the inflammatory effects were more pronounced for AA and at the liver level, while oxidative stress was induced both in the liver and kidney.

Indexed as

AnimalsAnimals, NewbornAristolochic AcidsCytokinesInflammationKidneyLiverOchratoxinsOxidative StressSwinearistolochic acid IAristolochic AcidsCytokinesochratoxin AOchratoxinsAristolochic acidKidneyLiverOchratoxin APig

Identifiers

PMID30033502
OpenAlexW2884061573

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.