Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30033446›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of cancer2018

Routine blood investigations have limited utility in surveillance of aggressive lymphoma in asymptomatic patients in complete remission.

Eliza A Hawkes, Zoe Loh, Ortis Estacio, Geoff Chong, Francis J Ha, Michael Gilbertson, Andrew Grigg

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of cancer, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Eliza A HawkesDepartment of Oncology and Clinical Haematology, Austin Hospital, Heidelberg, VIC, Australia. eliza.hawkes@onjcri.org.au.
Zoe LohDepartment of Oncology and Clinical Haematology, Austin Hospital, Heidelberg, VIC, Australia.
Ortis EstacioUniversity of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia.
Geoff ChongDepartment of Oncology and Clinical Haematology, Austin Hospital, Heidelberg, VIC, Australia.
Francis J HaMonash University, Clayton, VIC, Australia.
Michael GilbertsonDepartment of Haematology, Monash Medical Center, Monash Health, Clayton, VIC, Australia.
Andrew GriggDepartment of Oncology and Clinical Haematology, Austin Hospital, Heidelberg, VIC, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatients with aggressive lymphoma achieving complete remission (CR) after first-line combination chemotherapy undergo regular surveillance to detect relapse. Current international guidelines recommend routine follow-up blood tests in this context, but evidence supporting this practice is limited.

methodsWe conducted a multi-centre retrospective analysis of all patients diagnosed with aggressive lymphoma treated with curative-intent chemotherapy who achieved CR for at least 3 months between 2000 and 2015. An abnormal blood test was defined as any new and unexplained abnormality for full blood examination, lactate dehydrogenase or erythrocyte sedimentation rate.

resultsThree hundred and forty-six patients attended a total of 3084 outpatient visits; blood tests were performed at 90% of these appointments. Fifty-six (16%) patients relapsed. Routine laboratory testing detected relapse in only three patients (5% of relapses); in the remaining patients, relapse was suspected clinically (80%) or detected by imaging (15%). The sensitivity of all blood tests was 42% and the positive predictive value was 9%. No significant difference in survival was shown in patients who underwent a routine blood test within 3 months prior to relapse versus those who did not (p = 0.88).

conclusionsRoutine blood tests demonstrate unacceptably poor performance characteristics, have no impact on survival and thus have limited value in the detection of relapse in routine surveillance.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overDrug TherapyFemaleHumansLymphomaMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalNeoplasm StagingPopulation SurveillancePractice Guidelines as TopicRemission InductionRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID30033446
PMCPMC6162229

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.