Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30033262›Full record

ArticleMaterials science & engineering. C, Materials for biological applications2018

Comparative investigation of porous nano-hydroxyapaptite/chitosan, nano-zirconia/chitosan and novel nano-calcium zirconate/chitosan composite scaffolds for their potential applications in bone regeneration.

Bipin Gaihre, Ambalangodage C Jayasuriya

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Materials science & engineering. C, Materials for biological applications, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Anisotropic Piezoelectric Properties of Porous (BaMaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Recent trends in the application of widely used natural and synthetic polymer nanocomposites in bone tissue regeneration.Materials science & engineering. C, Materials for biological applications · 2020
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Application of Chitosan in Bone and Dental Engineering.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Bipin GaihreDepartment of Bioengineering, The University of Toledo, Toledo 43614, OH, USA.
Ambalangodage C JayasuriyaDepartment of Bioengineering, The University of Toledo, Toledo 43614, OH, USA; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Toledo Medical Center, Toledo 43614, OH, USA. Electronic address: a.jayasuriya@utoledo.edu.

Funding

Multifunctional bone putty for craniomaxillofacial bone repairR01DE023356 · NIDCR · UNIVERSITY OF TOLEDO HEALTH SCI CAMPUS · PI JAYASURIYA, AMBALANGODAGE CHAMPA · 2013 to 2017
$2.0M
NIDCR NIH HHS R01 DE023356
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Zirconium (Zr) based bioceramic nanoparticles, as the filler material to chitosan (CS), for the development of composite scaffolds are less studied compared to hydroxyapatite nanoparticles. This is predominantly due to the biological similarity of nano-hydroxyapatite (nHA; Ca

Indexed as

Bone RegenerationAnimalsCalcium CompoundsCell LineChitosanDurapatiteMiceNanocompositesOsteoblastsPorosityTissue ScaffoldsZirconiumCalcium CompoundsChitosanDurapatiteZirconiumzirconium oxideAtomic force microscopyCell proliferationChitosanCompositeMechanical propertiesNano-bioceramics

Identifiers

PMID30033262
PMCPMC6061966

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.