Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30032941›Full record

Trial reportJournal of substance abuse treatment2018

A sequential analysis of motivational interviewing technical skills and client responses.

M Barton Laws, Molly Magill, Nadine R Mastroleo, Kristi E Gamarel, Chanelle J Howe, Justin Walthers, Peter M Monti, Timothy Souza, Ira B Wilson, Gary S Rose and 1 more

Erratum issuedAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of substance abuse treatment, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Change talk subtypes as predictors of alcohol use following brief motivational intervention.Psychology of addictive behaviors : journal of the Society of Psychologists in Addictive Behaviors · 2023
    Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

M Barton LawsDepartment of Health Services, Policy and Practice, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, RI, United States. Electronic address: Michael_Barton_Laws@Brown.edu.
Molly MagillDepartment of Behavioral and Social Sciences and the Center for Alcohol and Addiction Studies, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, RI, United States.
Nadine R MastroleoCollege of Community and Public Affairs, Binghamton University, Binghamton, NY, United States.
Kristi E GamarelDepartment of Health Behavior and Health Education, University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, MI, United States.
Chanelle J HoweDepartment of Epidemiology, Centers for Epidemiology and Environmental Health, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, RI, United States.
Justin WalthersDepartment of Behavioral and Social Sciences and the Center for Alcohol and Addiction Studies, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, RI, United States.
Peter M MontiDepartment of Behavioral and Social Sciences and the Center for Alcohol and Addiction Studies, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, RI, United States.
Timothy SouzaDepartment of Behavioral and Social Sciences and the Center for Alcohol and Addiction Studies, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, RI, United States.
Ira B WilsonDepartment of Health Services, Policy and Practice, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, RI, United States.
Gary S RoseWilliam James College, Newton, MA, United States.
Christopher W KahlerDepartment of Behavioral and Social Sciences and the Center for Alcohol and Addiction Studies, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, RI, United States.
Brown University · USBinghamton University · USUniversity of Michigan · USWilliam James College · US

Funding

Tracking and Evaluation CoreU54GM115677 · NIGMS · BROWN UNIVERSITY · PI CHOUDHARY, GAURAV · 2016 to 2025
$45.0M
Virology CoreP01AA019072 · NIAAA · BROWN UNIVERSITY · PI WRAY, TYLER BLAKE · 2010 to 2024
$19.7M
MOTIVATIONAL INTERVIEWING FOR ETOH+ TEENS IN THE ERR01AA009892 · NIAAA · BROWN UNIVERSITY · PI MONTI, PETER M. · 1994 to 2014
$8.3M
Scientific/Technical CoreP2CHD041028 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI Sarah A. Burgard · 2017 to 2026
$6.5M
Mechanisms of Behavior Change Resource Core for Alcohol-HIV InterventionsU24AA022003 · NIAAA · BROWN UNIVERSITY · PI KAHLER, CHRISTOPHER W. · 2012 to 2020
$5.9M
Advancing a Bio-Psycho-Social Alcohol Treatment Research and Mentoring ProgramK05AA019681 · NIAAA · BROWN UNIVERSITY · PI MONTI, PETER M. · 2010 to 2014
$1.2M
NIAAA NIH HHS K05 AA019681NIAAA NIH HHS P01 AA019072NIAAA NIH HHS R01 AA009892NIAAA NIH HHS U24 AA022003NICHD NIH HHS P2C HD041028NIGMS NIH HHS U54 GM115677
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe technical hypothesis of Motivational Interviewing (MI) proposes that: (a) client talk favoring behavior change, or Change Talk (CT) is associated with better behavior change outcomes, whereas client talk against change, or Sustain Talk (ST) is associated with less favorable outcomes, and (b) specific therapist verbal behaviors influence whether client CT or ST occurs. MI consistent (MICO) therapist behaviors are hypothesized to be positively associated with more client CT and MI inconsistent (MIIN) behaviors with more ST. Previous studies typically examine session-level frequency counts or immediate lag sequential associations between these variables. However, research has found that the strongest determinant of CT or ST is the client's previous CT or ST statement. Therefore, the objective of this paper was to examine the association between therapist MI skills and subsequent client talk, while accounting for prior client talk.

methodsWe analyzed data from a manualized MI intervention targeting both alcohol misuse and sexual risk behavior in 132 adults seen in two hospital emergency departments. Transcripts of encounters were coded using the Motivational Interviewing Skills Code (MISC 2.5) and an additional measure, the Generalized Behavioral Intervention Analysis System (GBIAS). Using these measures, we analyzed the association between client talk following specific classifications of MICO skills, with the client's prior statement as a potential confounder or effect modifier.

resultsWith closed questions as the reference category, therapist simple reflections and paraphrasing reflections were associated with significantly greater odds of maintaining client talk as CT or ST. Open questions and complex reflections were associated with significantly greater odds of CT following ST, were not associated significantly with more ST following ST, and were associated with more ST following CT (i.e., through an association with less Follow Neutral).

conclusionsSimple and paraphrasing reflections appear to maintain client CT but are not associated with transitioning client ST to CT. By contrast, complex reflections and open questions appeared to be more strongly associated with clients moving from ST to CT than other techniques. These results suggest that counselors may differentially employ certain MICO technical skills to elicit continued CT and move participants toward ST within the MI dialogue.

Indexed as

Clinical CompetenceAdolescentAdultAlcoholismCounselorsEmergency Service, HospitalFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMotivational InterviewingProfessional-Patient RelationsRisk-TakingSexual BehaviorYoung AdultChange talkMI technical skillsMotivational interviewingSequential analysisSustain talk

Identifiers

PMID30032941
PMCPMC6250061
OpenAlexW2809109916

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.