Trial reportJournal of substance abuse treatment2018
Ecological momentary assessments for self-monitoring and counseling to optimize methamphetamine treatment and sexual risk reduction outcomes among gay and bisexual men.
Trial report in Journal of substance abuse treatment, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.
- A Systematic Review of Recent Methodological Approaches for Using Ecological Momentary Assessment to Examine Outcomes in U.S. Based HIV Research.Current HIV/AIDS reports · 2020Pooled it
- Electronic and other new media technology interventions for HIV care and prevention: a systematic review.Journal of the International AIDS Society · 2020Pooled it
- Individual Variability in Physiological Responses and Psychological Conditions Associated With Methamphetamine Use: Pilot Ecological Momentary Assessment Study Using a Wearable Device and Self-Monitoring Mobile App.JMIR formative research · 2026Article
- The Development of a Patient-Centered Digital Health Care Technology for Young Adults in Opioid Use Disorder Treatment: Qualitative Study.JMIR formative research · 2025Article
- Digital Psychosocial Interventions Tailored for People in Opioid Use Disorder Treatment: Scoping Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Article
- Digital health interventions for people who use methamphetamine: a scoping review.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2025Review
- Development, Implementation, and Evaluation Methods for Dashboards in Health Care: Scoping Review.JMIR medical informatics · 2024Article
- Acceptability of an mHealth App for Monitoring Perinatal and Postpartum Mental Health: Qualitative Study With Women and Providers.JMIR formative research · 2023Article
- Psychosocial and pharmacologic interventions for problematic methamphetamine use: Findings from a scoping review of the literature.PloS one · 2023Article
- A scoping review of alcohol, tobacco, and other drug use treatment interventions for sexual and gender minority populations.Journal of substance abuse treatment · 2022Article
- Ecological Momentary Assessment and mHealth Interventions Among Men Who Have Sex With Men: Scoping Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2021Article
- Bridging the Digital Divide Among Racial and Ethnic Minority Men Who Have Sex With Men to Reduce Substance Use and HIV Risk: Mixed Methods Feasibility Study.JMIR mHealth and uHealth · 2020Article
- Impact of Mobile Phone-Based Interventions on Methamphetamine Use and High-risk Sexual Behaviors in Men Who Have Sex with Men (MSM): A Systematic Review.Addiction & health · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
This pilot study evaluated the use of smartphone ecological momentary assessments (EMA) for self-monitoring to optimize treatment outcomes among gay and bisexual men enrolled in an outpatient methamphetamine abuse treatment service program. Participants (N = 34) received EMA prompts five times daily to self-monitor their methamphetamine use, cravings, sexual risk behaviors, and associated triggers and affect throughout the 8-week treatment program. Participants were randomized into either a self-directed condition with access to a web-based EMA response visualization dashboard ("EMA + Dashboard"; n = 16); or, a counselor-supported condition incorporating weekly, 30-min, one-on-one counseling sessions to review and discuss the participant's self-monitoring data on the dashboard ("EMA + Dashboard + Counselor"; n = 18). Pilot participants were compared with historical controls (n = 102) as the reference group in multiple regression analyses to assess the impact of the two study conditions on the treatment service program outcomes. Study participants with weekly counseling (EMA + Dashboard + Counselor) exhibited significantly greater reductions in the number of condomless anal intercourse episodes than historical controls (IRR = 0.02, 95% CI [0.00, 0.30]), whereas the reduction was of similar magnitude as controls in the EMA + Dashboard self-directed condition (IRR = 0.23, 95% CI [0.02, 3.56]). Treatment effects were not significant for comparisons between the two study conditions and historical controls for self-reported methamphetamine use (EMA + Dashboard: IRR = 1.06, 95% CI [0.32, 3.49]; EMA + Dashboard+Counselor: IRR = 0.46, 95% CI [0.14, 1.49]), number of male partners (EMA + Dashboard: IRR = 1.02, 95% CI [0.39, 2.61]; EMA + Dashboard+Counselor: IRR = 0.54, 95% CI [0.20, 1.45]), and the likelihood of providing a urine sample that tested positive for methamphetamine metabolites (EMA + Dashboard: OR = 1.00, 95% CI [0.79, 1.25]; EMA + Dashboard + Counselor: OR = 0.93, 95% CI [0.74, 1.16]). The pilot study provides preliminary evidence that the treatment outcome for condomless anal intercourse can be improved through a combination of smartphone- and counselor-assisted self-monitoring.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.