Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30032443›Full record

Trial reportEuropean journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology2018

Comparative phase I randomized open-label pilot clinical trial of Gynophilus

Caroline Dausset, Stéphane Patrier, Pawel Gajer, Claudia Thoral, Yann Lenglet, Jean-Michel Cardot, Philippe Judlin, Jacques Ravel, Adrien Nivoliez

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. ProbioticFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2021
    Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Caroline DaussetResearch and Development Department, BIOSE, Aurillac, France. c.dausset@biose.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8281-1111
Stéphane PatrierResearch and Development Department, BIOSE, Aurillac, France.
Pawel GajerInstitute for Genome Sciences, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Claudia ThoralResearch and Development Department, BIOSE, Aurillac, France.
Yann LengletGynecology and Obstetrics Department, Jacques Lacarin Hospital Center, Vichy, France.
Jean-Michel CardotBiopharmaceutical Department, UMR MEDIS, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Clermont Auvergne, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Philippe JudlinGynecology and Obstetrics Department, Nancy University Hospital, Nancy, France.
Jacques RavelInstitute for Genome Sciences, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Adrien NivoliezResearch and Development Department, BIOSE, Aurillac, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gynophilus

Indexed as

Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosusMicrobiotaAdministration, IntravaginalAdultCapsulesDelayed-Action PreparationsFemaleHumansMiddle AgedPilot ProjectsTabletsTreatment OutcomeVaginaCapsulesDelayed-Action PreparationsTabletsLcr35Live biotherapeutic productMuco-adhesive tabletSafetySlow releaseVaginal infectionsVaginal microbiota

Identifiers

PMID30032443
PMCPMC6154122

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.