Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30032438›Full record

ArticleOecologia2018

Ectomycorrhizal fungal species differentially affect the induced defensive chemistry of lodgepole pine.

Sanat S Kanekar, Jonathan A Cale, Nadir Erbilgin

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Oecologia, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sanat S KanekarDepartment of Renewable Resources, University of Alberta, 442 Earth Sciences Building, Edmonton, AB, T6G 2E3, Canada.
Jonathan A CaleDepartment of Renewable Resources, University of Alberta, 442 Earth Sciences Building, Edmonton, AB, T6G 2E3, Canada. jacale@ualberta.ca.
Nadir ErbilginDepartment of Renewable Resources, University of Alberta, 442 Earth Sciences Building, Edmonton, AB, T6G 2E3, Canada.
University of Alberta · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Plants interact simultaneously with multiple organisms, including ectomycorrhizal (EM) fungal symbionts which benefit plants by facilitating resource acquisition. Yet, their role in induced plant defenses that rely on the allocation of plant resources has received little attention. We investigated whether EM fungi can affect the induction of defense-related monoterpenes in greenhouse-grown lodgepole pine (Pinus contorta var. latifolia) seedlings, and whether such effects differed between EM fungal species occurring alone or in combination. Fungal interactions on growth media were also assessed to complement the greenhouse study. Our study revealed that the production of certain monoterpenes is influenced by the fungal species colonizing pine roots. Furthermore, pine seedlings did not necessarily benefit from having associations with multiple EM fungi, as we found contrasting effects of single vs. multiple species of fungi on induced monoterpene responses. Finally, monoterpene responses were altered when early-colonizing species inhibited the colonization or development of later-arriving species. We conclude that the presence of EM fungi can impact host susceptibility to insect and pathogen attack, suggesting that seedlings establishing in areas lacking fungi that promote the induction of tree defense chemicals may suffer from increased susceptibility to future pest damage.

Indexed as

ColeopteraMycorrhizaePinusAnimalsMonoterpenesTreesMonoterpenesCenococcum geophilumDendroctonus ponderosaeLaccaria bicolorPinus contorta

Identifiers

PMID30032438
OpenAlexW2882979918

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.