Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30032407›Full record

ArticlePrevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research2021

Facilitators and Barriers in Cross-Country Transport of Evidence-based Preventive Interventions: a Case Study Using the Family Check-Up.

Anne M Mauricio, Jenna Rudo-Stern, Thomas J Dishion, Daniel S Shaw, Anne M Gill, Julie S Lundgren, Jenny Thunberg, Närhälsan Center for Progress in Children’s Mental Health

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Building a Culture of Prevention: Tasks for Multi-Taskers.Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research · 2021
    Article
  8. Introduction to the Special Issue on "Promoting a Culture of Prevention: an International Perspective".Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research · 2021
    Article
  9. Commentary on the Culture of Prevention.Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Anne M MauricioREACH Institute, Department of Psychology, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, USA. anne.mauricio@asu.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-0818-3249
Jenna Rudo-SternREACH Institute, Department of Psychology, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, USA.
Thomas J DishionREACH Institute, Department of Psychology, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, USA.
Daniel S ShawDepartment of Psychology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Anne M GillDepartment of Psychology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Julie S LundgrenNärhälsan Center for Progress in Children's Mental Health, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Jenny ThunbergNärhälsan Center for Progress in Children's Mental Health, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Närhälsan Center for Progress in Children’s Mental Health

Funding

Relationship Dynamics and Young Adult Drug Use and AbuseR01AA022071 · NIAAA · ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY-TEMPE CAMPUS · PI HA, PHUONG THAO · 2012 to 2016
$2.4M
NIAAA NIH HHS R01 AA022071
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study is a qualitative analysis of facilitators and barriers in the dissemination of Family Check-Up (FCU), a U.S.-developed preventive intervention in Sweden. The FCU is inherently culturally flexible because it was designed to be tailored to each family's needs and context, including cultural norms and values. We present the FCU implementation framework (IF) as a conceptual framework for cross-country transport of the FCU and evidence-based programs (EBP) more generally. The FCU IF draws from implementation science literature and involves specifying barriers and facilitators related to implementation drivers (e.g., competency) at each implementation phase and applying these data to inform phase-specific, readiness-building activities for each driver. In addition to driver-related influences, barriers and facilitators specific to the FCU and the collaborative partnership between the U.S. and Swedish purveyors emerged in the data. The partnership's reliance on a hybrid bottom-up, top-down approach that balanced the Swedish purveyor's autonomy and cultural expertise with guidance from the U.S. purveyor facilitated adaptation of the FCU for Sweden. Relying on previously collected data, we also explored similarities and differences in barriers and facilitators to FCU scale-up in the United States versus Sweden. In general, across drivers, the same barriers and facilitators were salient. This study suggests that dissemination of culturally flexible EBPs guided by a dynamic implementation framework can facilitate cross-country transport of EBPs. This study promotes a culture of prevention by highlighting barriers, facilitators, and readiness-building strategies that influence the cross-cultural transportability of EBPs that prevent the onset and escalation of child problem behavior.

Indexed as

Family HealthPreventive Health ServicesCross-Cultural ComparisonEvidence-Based MedicineFocus GroupsHumansSwedenUnited StatesBarriersCross-country transport of EBPsFacilitatorsImplementation framework

Identifiers

PMID30032407
PMCPMC6940536

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.