ArticleMolecular biology reports2018
Levels and fluxes in enzymatic antioxidants following gamma irradiation are inadequate to confer radiation resistance in Drosophila melanogaster.
Article in Molecular biology reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Ionizing radiation alters functional neurotransmission inFrontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2023Article
- Radioprotective role of uric acid: evidence from studies in Drosophila and human dermal fibroblast cells.Molecular biology reports · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Ionizing radiation (IR) causes biological effects either by directly damaging the molecules or by generating free radicals. Antioxidant mechanisms are believed to be involved in neutralising free radicals. Levels of antioxidants therefore assume significance in determining the extent of radiation damage. The fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster (D. melanogaster) exhibits remarkable IR tolerance compared to mammals. Present study addresses the questions (1) Whether levels of antioxidants are high in radio-tolerant fruit fly D. melanogaster compared to mammals? (2) Does the antioxidant activity enhance adequately enough post-irradiation? We analysed enzymatic antioxidant profiles and their fluxes prior to and 60 min post-irradiation (50 Gy). Enzymatic antioxidants were analysed in all the developmental stages of D. melanogaster as the fruit fly shows dramatic changes in radiation resistance during development. Activity of superoxide dismutase (SOD) in Drosophila (pre-irradiation) was comparable to that of mammals. Catalase activity was lower than mammals while glutathione peroxidise (DmGPx) activity was significantly higher. Following irradiation SOD showed changes ranging from 1.40 to 1.62 folds only in larval stages. Catalase activity showed positive change of 1.25 folds only in adults. Activity of DmGPx was largely unaffected. Early pupae showed increased (3.67 fold) glutathione S-transferase activity post-irradiation. Non-enzymatic antioxidants such as total antioxidant capacity showed significant whereas reduced glutathione showed insignificant flux. In conclusion, the levels of enzymatic antioxidants in Drosophila compared to IR sensitive mammals and post-irradiation fluxes in antioxidant enzyme levels appear inadequate to explicate the dramatic radiation resistance observed in Drosophila. The observations are in agreement with the recent findings refuting the role of enzymatic antioxidants in radiation resistance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.