Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30032353›Full record

ArticleExperimental brain research2018

Changes in corticospinal excitability associated with motor learning by observing.

Heather R McGregor, Michael Vesia, Cricia Rinchon, Robert Chen, Paul L Gribble

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental brain research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Heather R McGregorThe Brain and Mind Institute, The University of Western Ontario, London, ON, Canada.
Michael VesiaSchool of Kinesiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Cricia RinchonKrembil Research Institute, Toronto Western Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Robert ChenKrembil Research Institute, Toronto Western Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Paul L GribbleThe Brain and Mind Institute, The University of Western Ontario, London, ON, Canada. paul@gribblelab.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1368-032X
Toronto Western Hospital · CAWestern University · CAUniversity of Michigan · US

Funding

Training-Induced Plasticity in Human Motor and Sensory SystemsR01HD075740 · NICHD · HASKINS LABORATORIES, INC. · PI OSTRY, DAVID J · 2013 to 2017
$3.2M
National Institute of Child Health and Human Development R01HD075740NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD075740
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While many of our motor skills are acquired through physical practice, we can also learn how to make movements by observing others. For example, individuals can learn how to reach in novel dynamical environments ('force fields', FF) by observing the movements of a tutor. Previous neurophysiological and neuroimaging studies in humans suggest a role for the motor system in motor learning by observing. Here, we tested the role of primary motor cortex (M1) in motor learning by observing. We used single-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation to elicit motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) in hand muscles at rest. MEPs were elicited before and after participants observed either a video showing a tutor adapting her reaches to an FF or a control video showing a tutor performing reaches in an unlearnable FF. During MEP acquisition, participants fixated a crosshair while their hand muscles were relaxed. We predicted that observing motor learning would result in greater increases in offline M1 excitability compared to observing movements that did not involve learning. We found that observing FF learning resulted in subsequent increases in MEP amplitudes recorded from right first dorsal interosseous and right abductor pollicis brevis muscles at rest. There were no changes in MEP amplitudes after control participants observed a tutor performing similar movements but not learning. The observed MEP changes can thus be specifically linked to observing motor learning. These results are consistent with the idea that observing motor learning produces functional changes in M1, corticospinal networks or both.

Indexed as

Analysis of VarianceElectroencephalographyElectromyographyEvoked Potentials, MotorFemaleHumansLearningMaleMotor CortexMotor SkillsMuscle, SkeletalPhotic StimulationPyramidal TractsRange of Motion, ArticularYoung AdultAction observationCorticospinal excitabilityHumanMotor learningPrimary motor cortexTranscranial magnetic stimulation

Identifiers

PMID30032353
PMCPMC6139265
OpenAlexW2951691801

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.