Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30032336›Full record

ReviewCurrent treatment options in neurology2018

Congenital Myasthenic Syndromes: a Clinical and Treatment Approach.

Constantine Farmakidis, Mamatha Pasnoor, Richard J Barohn, Mazen M Dimachkie

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current treatment options in neurology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. A Pediatric Case ofChildren (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Study on the Potential Mechanism ofEvidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM · 2022
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Constantine FarmakidisUniversity of Kansas Medical Center, 3901 Rainbow Blvd, Mail Stop 2012, Kansas City, KS, 66160, USA.
Mamatha PasnoorUniversity of Kansas Medical Center, 3901 Rainbow Blvd, Mail Stop 2012, Kansas City, KS, 66160, USA.
Richard J BarohnUniversity of Kansas Medical Center, 3901 Rainbow Blvd, Mail Stop 2012, Kansas City, KS, 66160, USA.
Mazen M DimachkieDepartment of Neurology, University of Kansas Medical Center, 3901 Rainbow Blvd, Mail Stop 2012, Kansas City, KS, 66160, USA. mdimachkie@kumc.edu.
University of Kansas Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewCongenital myasthenia syndromes are clinically and genetically heterogeneous but treatable conditions. Careful selection of drug therapy is paramount as the same drug can be effective, ineffective, and even harmful in different congenital myasthenia syndromes. The purpose of this article is to review current treatment options for these conditions. RECENT

findingsNext-generation sequencing has accelerated the discovery of new genes and facilitated the description of novel congenital myasthenic syndromes. Retrospective therapy data from these newly identified syndromes has provided additional insight on the management of these conditions. Cholinergic agents, β-adrenergic agonists, and open-channel blockers remain the principal treatment modalities, and their optimal use depends on an accurate genetic diagnosis and the timely clinical recognition of the disease. In particular, pyridostigmine, usually a first-line agent, should be avoided in DOK7, acetylcholinesterase deficiency, and slow-channel congenital myasthenic syndromes. Beta-adrenergic agonists have been recognized as a first-line agent for a number of congenital myasthenic syndromes, particularly DOK7 and acetylcholinesterase deficiency, whereas long-lived open-channel blockers of the acetylcholine receptor (AChR) ion channel are indicated for the slow-channel congenital myasthenic syndrome. Beta-adrenergic agonists additionally have an important adjunct treatment for congenital myasthenia syndrome due to glycosylation defects, fast channel syndrome, AChR deficiency, and choline acetyltransferase deficiency (ChaT) and therefore may be particularly important in the treatment of syndromes due to defects in motor endplate development and repair. Unlike in autoimmune myasthenia gravis, there is no role for immunotherapy in congenital myasthenic syndromes. If available, a genetic diagnosis should drive the choice for a first-line treatment agent between cholinergic agents, β-adrenergic agents, and open-channel blockers. Evaluation and supportive care at centers with experience in these rare syndromes likely are paramount in achieving optimal outcomes. Furthermore, gene discovery for congenital myasthenic syndromes has provided novel insights on the role of protein glycosylation, endplate maintenance and repair, and synaptic vesicle exocytosis in neuromuscular transmission. These insights may lead to new therapeutic strategies in both congenital and autoimmune myasthenic diseases in the future.

Indexed as

3,4-DiaminopyridineAlbuterolCongenital myasthenic syndromesFluoxetinePyridostigmineQuinidine

Identifiers

PMID30032336
OpenAlexW2883098810

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.