Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30031805›Full record

ArticleGastrointestinal endoscopy2018

Tethered capsule endomicroscopy for microscopic imaging of the esophagus, stomach, and duodenum without sedation in humans (with video).

Michalina J Gora, Lucille Quénéhervé, Robert W Carruth, Weina Lu, Mireille Rosenberg, Jenny S Sauk, Alessio Fasano, Gregory Y Lauwers, Norman S Nishioka, Guillermo J Tearney

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Gastrointestinal endoscopy, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Application of optical coherence tomography in clinical diagnosis.Journal of X-ray science and technology · 2019
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Endoscope Capsules: The Present Situation and Future Outlooks.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Feasibility and Safety of Tethered Capsule Endomicroscopy in Patients With Barrett's Esophagus in a Multi-Center Study.Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association · 2022
    Article
  15. Optical coherence tomography.Nature reviews. Methods primers · 2022
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. A review of low-cost and portable optical coherence tomography.Progress in biomedical engineering (Bristol, England) · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Michalina J GoraICube Laboratory, CNRS, Strasbourg University, Strasbourg, France; Wellman Center for Photomedicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Lucille QuénéhervéWellman Center for Photomedicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; Institut des Maladies de l'Appareil Digestif, IMAD, CHU Nantes, Hopital Hôtel-Dieu, Nantes, France.
Robert W CarruthWellman Center for Photomedicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Weina LuWellman Center for Photomedicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Mireille RosenbergWellman Center for Photomedicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Jenny S SaukDepartment of Gastroenterology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Alessio FasanoDepartment of Pediatrics, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Gregory Y LauwersDepartment of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Norman S NishiokaWellman Center for Photomedicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; Department of Gastroenterology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Guillermo J TearneyWellman Center for Photomedicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; Harvard-MIT Division of Health Sciences Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
Massachusetts General Hospital · USHarvard University · USUniversité de Strasbourg · FR

Funding

Improving screening &surveillance in Barrett's patientsR01CA103769 · NCI · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI TEARNEY, GUILLERMO J · 2003 to 2014
$5.1M
Celiac Disease Diagnosis using Tethered Capsule EndomicroscopyR01DK100569 · NIDDK · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI TEARNEY, GUILLERMO J · 2014 to 2018
$2.7M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA103769NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK100569
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimsPatients with many different digestive diseases undergo repeated EGDs throughout their lives. Tethered capsule endomicroscopy (TCE) is a less-invasive method for obtaining high-resolution images of the GI mucosa for diagnosis and treatment planning of GI tract diseases. In this article, we present our results from a single-center study aimed at testing the safety and feasibility of TCE for imaging the esophagus, stomach, and duodenum.

methodsAfter being swallowed by a participant without sedation, the tethered capsule obtains cross-sectional, 10 μm-resolution, optical coherence tomography images as the device traverses the alimentary tract. After imaging, the device is withdrawn through the mouth, disinfected, and reused. Safety and feasibility of TCE were tested, focusing on imaging the esophagus of healthy volunteers and patients with Barrett's esophagus (BE) and the duodenum of healthy volunteers. Images were compared with endoscopy and histopathology findings when available.

resultsThirty-eight patients were enrolled. No adverse effects were reported. The TCE device swallowing rate was 34 of 38 (89%). The appearance of a physiologic upper GI wall, including its microscopic pathology, was visualized with a tissue coverage of 85.4% ± 14.9% and 90.3% ± 6.8% in the esophagus of BE patients with and without endoscopic evidence of a hiatal hernia, respectively, as well as 84.8% ± 7.4% in the duodenum. A blinded comparison of TCE and endoscopic BE measurements showed a strong to very strong correlation (r = 0.7-0.83; P < .05) for circumferential extent and a strong correlation (r = 0.77-0.78; P < .01) for maximum extent (Prague classification). TCE interobserver correlation was very strong, at r = 0.92 and r = 0.84 (P < .01), for Prague classification circumferential (C) and maximal (M) length measurements, respectively.

conclusionsTCE is a safe and feasible procedure for obtaining high-resolution microscopic images of the upper GI tract without endoscopic assistance or sedation.

Indexed as

AdultCapsule EndoscopyChi-Square DistributionCohort StudiesDuodenumEndoscopy, Digestive SystemEsophagusFeasibility StudiesFemaleGastric MucosaHealthy VolunteersHumansIntestinal MucosaLinear ModelsMaleMiddle Aged

Identifiers

PMID30031805
PMCPMC8176642
OpenAlexW2884536471

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.