Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30030719›Full record

ArticleJournal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract2018

A Novel Pathological Prognostic Score (PPS) to Identify "Very High-Risk" Patients: a Multicenter Retrospective Analysis of 506 Patients with High Risk Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor (GIST).

Xuechao Liu, Haibo Qiu, Zhiming Wu, Peng Zhang, Xingyu Feng, Tao Chen, Yong Li, Kaixiong Tao, Guoxin Li, Xiaowei Sun and 2 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Xuechao LiuState Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China; Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, 510060, China.
Haibo QiuState Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China; Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, 510060, China.
Zhiming WuState Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China; Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, 510060, China.
Peng ZhangDepartment of General Surgery, Union Hospital Tongji Medical College Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Xingyu FengDepartment of General Surgery, Guangdong General Hospital, Guangzhou, China.
Tao ChenDepartment of General Surgery, Southern Medical University Nanfang Hospital, Guangzhou, China.
Yong LiDepartment of General Surgery, Guangdong General Hospital, Guangzhou, China.
Kaixiong TaoDepartment of General Surgery, Union Hospital Tongji Medical College Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Guoxin LiDepartment of General Surgery, Southern Medical University Nanfang Hospital, Guangzhou, China.
Xiaowei SunState Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China; Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, 510060, China. sunxw@sysucc.org.cn.
Zhiwei ZhouState Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China; Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, 510060, China. zhouzhw@sysucc.org.cn.
China Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor Study Group (CN-GIST)
Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center · CNGuangdong General Hospital · CNHuazhong University of Science and Technology · CNNanfang Hospital · CNSouthern Medical University · CNUnion Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo determine the better risk stratification based on surgical pathology and to assess the clinical outcomes after curative resection with a new scoring system in high risk gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) patients.

methodsWe retrospectively evaluated 506 high-risk GIST patients who underwent curative resection as initial treatment at four centers from 2001 to 2015.

resultsMultivariate analysis revealed that only Ki-67 labeling index (LI) and mitotic index were independent prognostic factors of overall survival (OS). For the two tumor-related pathological factors, Ki-67 LI > 7% and mitotic index ≥ 7/50 high power fields were allocated 1 point each. The total score was defined as the Pathological Prognostic Score (PPS). When Ki-67 LI and mitotic index were replaced by PPS, a multivariate analysis still identified PPS as an independent predictor of OS (HR 2.719; 95% CI 1.309-5.650; P = 0.007). Patients with a PPS of 0, 1, or 2 had a 5-year survival of 91.8, 79.8, and 51.0%, respectively (P = 0.001). Furthermore, an elevated PPS (PPS = 2) was associated with larger tumor size, non-stomach tumor, and open resection (all P < 0.05).

conclusionThe PPS independently predicted postoperative survival in high-risk GIST, and it might facilitate the selection of appropriate treatment strategy for these patients.

Indexed as

Health Status IndicatorsAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleGastrointestinal Stromal TumorsHumansKi-67 AntigenMaleMiddle AgedMitotic IndexPrognosisRetrospective StudiesRisk AssessmentSurvival AnalysisYoung AdultKi-67 AntigenGastrointestinal stromal tumorKi-67 labeling indexMitotic indexPathological prognostic scorePrognosis

Identifiers

PMID30030719
OpenAlexW2883146518

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.