Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30030697›Full record

ReviewMolecular imaging and biology2018

The Potential of In Vivo Imaging for Optimization of Molecular and Cellular Anti-cancer Immunotherapies.

Gilbert O Fruhwirth, Manfred Kneilling, I Jolanda M de Vries, Bettina Weigelin, Mangala Srinivas, Erik H J G Aarntzen

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Molecular imaging and biology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Preclinical PET, PET/CT, and PET/MRI.Recent results in cancer research. Fortschritte der Krebsforschung. Progres dans les recherches sur le cancer · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Anti-Colorectal Cancer Activity ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Non-invasive Reporter Gene Imaging of Cell Therapies, including T Cells and Stem Cells.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2020
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Cell Tracking in Cancer Immunotherapy.Frontiers in medicine · 2020
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Gilbert O FruhwirthDepartment of Imaging Chemistry and Biology, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, Kings' College London, London, UK.
Manfred KneillingDepartment of Preclinical Imaging and Radiopharmacy, Werner Siemens Imaging Center, Eberhard Karls University, Tuebingen, Germany.
I Jolanda M de VriesDepartment of Tumor Immunology, Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Bettina WeigelinGenitourinary Medical Oncology and Koch Center, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA.
Mangala SrinivasDepartment of Tumor Immunology, Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3835-1995
Erik H J G AarntzenDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Geert Grooteplein 10, PO Box 9101, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. erik.aarntzen@radboudumc.nl.

Funding

British Heart FoundationCancer Research UK 21153Cancer Research UK C48390/A21153European Research Council 336454Medical Research Council MC_PC_14105Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust WT 203148/Z/16/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This review aims to emphasize the potential of in vivo imaging to optimize current and upcoming anti-cancer immunotherapies: spanning from preclinical to clinical applications. Immunotherapies are an emerging class of treatments for a variety of diseases. The agents include molecular and cellular therapeutics, which aim to treat the disease through re-education of the host immune system, often via complex mechanisms of action. In vivo imaging has the potential to contribute in several different ways: (1) as a drug development tool to improve our understanding of their complex mechanisms of action, (2) as a tool to predict efficacy, for example, to stratify patients into probable responders and likely non-responders, and (3) as a non-invasive treatment response biomarker to guide efficient immunotherapy use and to recognize early signs of potential loss of efficacy or resistance in patients. Areas where in vivo imaging is already successfully implemented in onco-immunology research will be discussed and domains where its use offers great potential will be highlighted. The focus of this article is on anti-cancer immunotherapy as it currently is the most advanced immunotherapy area. However, the described concepts can also be paralleled in other immune-mediated disorders and for conditions requiring immunotherapeutic intervention. Importantly, we introduce a new study group within the European Society of Molecular Imaging with the goal to facilitate and enhance immunotherapy development through the use of in vivo imaging.

Indexed as

ImmunotherapyMolecular ImagingAnimalsAntineoplastic AgentsBiomarkers, TumorHumansNeoplasmsTreatment OutcomeAntineoplastic AgentsBiomarkers, TumorImaging biomarkerImmunotherapyIn vivo imagingOncologyTranslation

Identifiers

PMID30030697
PMCPMC6153672

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.