ArticleJournal of mathematical biology2019
Coalescence times for three genes provide sufficient information to distinguish population structure from population size changes.
Article in Journal of mathematical biology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- A structured coalescent model reveals deep ancestral structure shared by all modern humans.Nature genetics · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The increasing amount of genomic data currently available is expanding the horizons of population genetics inference. A wide range of methods have been published allowing to detect and date major changes in population size during the history of species. At the same time, there has been an increasing recognition that population structure can generate genetic data similar to those generated under models of population size change. Recently, Mazet et al. (Heredity 116(4):362-371, 2016) introduced the idea that, for any model of population structure, it is always possible to find a panmictic model with a particular function of population size-change having an identical distribution of [Formula: see text] (the time of the first coalescence for a sample of size two). This implies that there is an identifiability problem between a panmictic and a structured model when we base our analysis only on [Formula: see text]. In this paper, based on an analytical study of the rate matrix of the ancestral lineage process, we obtain new theoretical results about the joint distribution of the coalescence times [Formula: see text] for a sample of three haploid genes in a n-island model with constant size. Even if, for any [Formula: see text], it is always possible to find a size-change scenario for a panmictic population such that the marginal distribution of [Formula: see text] is exactly the same as in a n-island model with constant population size, we show that the joint distribution of the coalescence times [Formula: see text] for a sample of three genes contains enough information to distinguish between a panmictic population and a n-island model of constant size.
Indexed as
Identifiers
30030601What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.