Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30030587›Full record

Observational studyOsteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA2018

Incidence of subsequent fractures in the UK between 1990 and 2012 among individuals 50 years or older.

R Y van der Velde, C E Wyers, P P M M Geusens, J P W van den Bergh, F de Vries, C Cooper, T P van de Staa, N C Harvey

Open access · bronzeAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Patient education following vertebral fragility fracture: a scoping review.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2025
    Article
  2. Epidemiology of forearm fractures in women and men in Norway 2008-2019.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2024
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Impact of Stroke History on the Risk of Recurrent Hip Fracture or Major Osteoporotic Fractures among Patients with Incident Hip Fracture: A Nationwide Cohort Study.Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. The global approach to rehabilitation following an osteoporotic fragility fracture: A review of the rehabilitation working group of the International Osteoporosis Foundation (IOF) committee of scientific advisors.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

R Y van der VeldeDepartment of Internal Medicine, VieCuri Medical Centre, PO Box 1926, 5900 BX, Venlo, The Netherlands.
C E WyersDepartment of Internal Medicine, VieCuri Medical Centre, PO Box 1926, 5900 BX, Venlo, The Netherlands.
P P M M GeusensDepartment of Internal Medicine, Subdivision Rheumatology, CAPHRI, Maastricht University Medical Centre (MUMC), PO Box 616, 6200 MD, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
J P W van den BerghDepartment of Internal Medicine, VieCuri Medical Centre, PO Box 1926, 5900 BX, Venlo, The Netherlands.
F de VriesDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy & Toxicology, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
C CooperMRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK. cc@mrc.soton.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3510-0709
T P van de StaaDepartment of Pharmacoepidemiology & Clinical Pharmacology, Utrecht Institute for Pharmaceutical Sciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
N C HarveyMRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Maastricht University Medical Centre · NLUniversity Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust · GBUtrecht University · NL

Funding

Arthritis Research UK 17702Arthritis Research UK 21231Department of Health 10/33/04Department of Health HTA/10/33/04Medical Research Council G0400491Medical Research Council G0601019Medical Research Council MC_U147585819Medical Research Council MC_U147585824Medical Research Council MC_U147585827Medical Research Council MC_UP_A620_1014Medical Research Council MC_UP_A620_1015Medical Research Council MC_UU_12011/1Medical Research Council MC_UU_12011/2Versus Arthritis 17702Versus Arthritis 21231
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We studied the incidence of subsequent fractures in persons of 50+ years from 1990 to 2012 and the relative risk (RR) of subsequent fractures after an index femur/hip fracture, stratified per 5-year age band. Patients suffering a fracture have a high incidence of a subsequent fracture; the RR of subsequent fracture after a femur/hip fracture ranged from 2 to 7.

introductionRecent information on the risk of subsequent fractures after a broad range of index fractures in the UK population is scarce. We therefore studied the rates of subsequent fractures of the femur/hip, humerus, radius/ulna, vertebrae, rib, or pelvis after fractures at one of these sites from 1990 to 2012 in 3,156,347 UK men and women aged 50 years or over.

methodsWe undertook a retrospective observational study using the UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD). The incidence of subsequent fractures at a specific site was calculated by dividing the observed number of fractures by the number of person-years (py) at risk. The relative risk (RR) of subsequent fractures after a femur/hip fracture, by 5-year age band, was calculated by dividing the incidence of a specific subsequent fracture type by the incidence of first fractures at the same site in the same age group.

resultsThe highest subsequent fracture incidence after a femur/hip fracture was for humerus fracture in men (59.5/10.000 py) and radius/ulna fracture in women (117.2/10.000 py). After an index fracture of the radius/ulna, humerus fracture in men (59.3/10.000 py) and femur/hip fracture in women (82.4 per 10.000 py) were most frequent. The RR of fractures after a femur/hip fracture ranged from 2 to 7 and were highest in men and younger age groups.

conclusionPatients suffering a fracture have a high incidence of a subsequent fracture. Our findings demonstrate the importance of fracture prevention in patients with a history of a fracture by adequate medical diagnosis and treatment.

Indexed as

AgedAge DistributionDatabases, FactualFemaleFemoral FracturesHip FracturesHumansIncidenceMaleMiddle AgedOsteoporotic FracturesRecurrenceRetrospective StudiesRisk AssessmentUnited KingdomEpidemiologyFracture incidenceOsteoporosisSubsequent fractures

Identifiers

PMID30030587
PMCPMC6205600
OpenAlexW2884252866

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.