Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30030580›Full record

ArticleKnee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA2019

Intraoperative mobile-bearing movement in Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.

Kohei Kawaguchi, Hiroshi Inui, Shuji Taketomi, Ryota Yamagami, Keiu Nakazato, Nobuyuki Shirakawa, Sakae Tanaka

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kohei KawaguchiDepartment of Orthopaedics, Faculty of medicine, The University of Tokyo Hospital, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo, Tokyo, 111-0033, Japan.
Hiroshi InuiDepartment of Orthopaedics, Faculty of medicine, The University of Tokyo Hospital, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo, Tokyo, 111-0033, Japan. hiroshi_inu0707@yahoo.co.jp.
Shuji TaketomiDepartment of Orthopaedics, Faculty of medicine, The University of Tokyo Hospital, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo, Tokyo, 111-0033, Japan.
Ryota YamagamiDepartment of Orthopaedics, Faculty of medicine, The University of Tokyo Hospital, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo, Tokyo, 111-0033, Japan.
Keiu NakazatoDepartment of Orthopaedics, Faculty of medicine, The University of Tokyo Hospital, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo, Tokyo, 111-0033, Japan.
Nobuyuki ShirakawaDepartment of Orthopaedics, Faculty of medicine, The University of Tokyo Hospital, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo, Tokyo, 111-0033, Japan.
Sakae TanakaDepartment of Orthopaedics, Faculty of medicine, The University of Tokyo Hospital, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo, Tokyo, 111-0033, Japan.
University of Tokyo Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeMobile-bearing Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty has been used widely and successfully; however, there is no previous research on the intraoperative bearing movement. The purpose of this study was to characterise intraoperative bearing movement and investigate whether bearing movement relates to component positions, bearing size, intraoperative rotational kinematics and clinical results.

methodsA trial tibial component, which was scaled every 2 mm, was used to measure the intraoperative movement of the mobile bearings. Bearing movements from 30° flexion to deep flexion were classified into two groups: 30 patients exhibited posterior bearing movement that contacted the lateral wall of the tibial component (Group W), and 37 patients exhibited posterior bearing movement, without contact, or with only transient contact, with the lateral wall (Group S).

resultsAll mobile bearings moved posteriorly during knee flexion in the anteroposterior direction. In postoperative radiography with the knee flexed, the femoral component in Group W was significantly more laterally implanted than that in Group S. The width ratio between the bearing and tibial component in Group W was significantly greater than in Group S. There were no significant differences in other radiological measurements, intraoperative rotational kinematics or clinical results.

conclusionDuring knee flexion, all mobile bearings moved posteriorly, and mobile bearings whose femoral components were set laterally, tended to move posteriorly while in contact with the lateral wall. However, there were no significant differences in clinical evaluation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overArthroplasty, Replacement, KneeBiomechanical PhenomenaFemaleHumansKnee JointKnee ProsthesisMaleMovementPostoperative PeriodRadiographyRange of Motion, ArticularRetrospective StudiesTibiaIntraoperative movementKinematicsKneeMobile bearingUnicompartmental knee arthroplasty

Identifiers

PMID30030580
OpenAlexW2883993461

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.