Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30030483›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2018

Analysis of the influence of imaging-related uncertainties on cerebral aneurysm deformation quantification using a no-deformation physical flow phantom.

Daniel Schetelig, Jan Sedlacik, Jens Fiehler, Andreas Frölich, Tobias Knopp, Thilo Sothmann, Jonathan Waschkewitz, René Werner

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Daniel ScheteligUniversity Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Department of Computational Neuroscience, Hamburg, 20246, Germany. d.schetelig@uke.de.
Jan SedlacikUniversity Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, Hamburg, 20246, Germany.
Jens FiehlerUniversity Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, Hamburg, 20246, Germany.
Andreas FrölichUniversity Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, Hamburg, 20246, Germany.
Tobias KnoppUniversity Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Section for Biomedical Imaging, Hamburg, 20246, Germany.
Thilo SothmannUniversity Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Department of Computational Neuroscience, Hamburg, 20246, Germany.
Jonathan WaschkewitzUniversity Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Hamburg, 20246, Germany.
René WernerUniversity Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Department of Computational Neuroscience, Hamburg, 20246, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-2296-3305

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cardiac-cycle related pulsatile aneurysm motion and deformation is assumed to provide valuable information for assessing cerebral aneurysm rupture risk. Accordingly, numerous studies addressed quantification of cerebral aneurysm wall motion and deformation. Most of them utilized in vivo imaging data, but image-based aneurysm deformation quantification is subject to pronounced uncertainties: unknown ground-truth deformation; image resolution in the order of the expected deformation; direct interplay between contrast agent inflow and image intensity. To analyze the impact of the uncertainties on deformation quantification, a multi-imaging modality ground-truth phantom study is performed. A physical flow phantom was designed that allowed simulating pulsatile flow through a variety of modeled cerebral vascular structures. The phantom was imaged using different modalities [MRI, CT, 3D-RA] and mimicking physiologically realistic flow conditions. Resulting image data was analyzed by an established registration-based approach for automated wall motion quantification. The data reveals severe dependency between contrast media inflow-related image intensity changes and the extent of estimated wall deformation. The study illustrates that imaging-related uncertainties affect the accuracy of cerebral aneurysm deformation quantification, suggesting that in vivo imaging studies have to be accompanied by ground-truth phantom experiments to foster data interpretation and to prove plausibility of the applied image analysis algorithms.

Indexed as

MotionPhantoms, ImagingUncertaintyAlgorithmsAneurysm, RupturedBlood VesselsCerebrovascular CirculationHumansIntracranial AneurysmModels, BiologicalMultimodal ImagingPulsatile Flow

Identifiers

PMID30030483
PMCPMC6054631

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.