Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30030464›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2018

3D Printed Microfluidic Probes.

Ayoola Brimmo, Pierre-Alexandre Goyette, Roaa Alnemari, Thomas Gervais, Mohammad A Qasaimeh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Next-Generation Microfluidics for Biomedical Research and Healthcare Applications.Biomedical engineering and computational biology · 2023
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Pixel-based open-space microfluidics for versatile surface processing.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Microfluidic endothelium-on-a-chip development, from in vivo to in vitro experimental models.Romanian journal of morphology and embryology = Revue roumaine de morphologie et embryologie · 2020
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Integrating 3D Cell Culture of PC12 Cells with Microchip-Based Electrochemical Detection.Analytical methods : advancing methods and applications · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ayoola BrimmoDivision of Engineering, New York University Abu Dhabi, Abu Dhabi, UAE.
Pierre-Alexandre GoyetteInstitut de génie biomédical, École Polytechnique de Montréal, Montréal, Canada.
Roaa AlnemariDivision of Engineering, New York University Abu Dhabi, Abu Dhabi, UAE.
Thomas GervaisInstitut de génie biomédical, École Polytechnique de Montréal, Montréal, Canada. thomas.gervais@polymtl.ca.
Mohammad A QasaimehDivision of Engineering, New York University Abu Dhabi, Abu Dhabi, UAE. mohammad.qasaimeh@nyu.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-1122-9698

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this work, we fabricate microfluidic probes (MFPs) in a single step by stereolithographic 3D printing and benchmark their performance with standard MFPs fabricated via glass or silicon micromachining. Two research teams join forces to introduce two independent designs and fabrication protocols, using different equipment. Both strategies adopted are inexpensive and simple (they only require a stereolithography printer) and are highly customizable. Flow characterization is performed by reproducing previously published microfluidic dipolar and microfluidic quadrupolar reagent delivery profiles which are compared to the expected results from numerical simulations and scaling laws. Results show that, for most MFP applications, printer resolution artifacts have negligible impact on probe operation, reagent pattern formation, and cell staining results. Thus, any research group with a moderate resolution (≤100 µm) stereolithography printer will be able to fabricate the MFPs and use them for processing cells, or generating microfluidic concentration gradients. MFP fabrication involved glass and/or silicon micromachining, or polymer micromolding, in every previously published article on the topic. We therefore believe that 3D printed MFPs is poised to democratize this technology. We contribute to initiate this trend by making our CAD files available for the readers to test our "print & probe" approach using their own stereolithographic 3D printers.

Identifiers

PMID30030464
PMCPMC6054653

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.