ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2018
Face Repetition Probability Does Not Affect Repetition Suppression in Macaque Inferotemporal Cortex.
Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
25 citing papers in PubMed, 56 citations in OpenAlex.
- Limited Evidence for Probabilistic Cueing Effects on Grating-Evoked Event-Related Potentials and Orientation Decoding Performance.Psychophysiology · 2025Article
- Discrete Repetition Effects for Visual Words Compared to Faces and Animals, but No Modulation by Expectation: An Event-Related Potential Study.The European journal of neuroscience · 2025Article
- Feature-specific predictive processing: What's in a prediction error?Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2025Article
- Distinguishing expectation and attention effects in processing temporal patterns of visual input.Brain and cognition · 2024Article
- Recent Visual Experience Reshapes V4 Neuronal Activity and Improves Perceptual Performance.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024Article
- Prediction error processing and sharpening of expected information across the face-processing hierarchy.Nature communications · 2024Article
- Gradual change of cortical representations with growing visual expertise for synthetic shapes.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2024Article
- Adaptation of the inferior temporal neurons and efficient visual processing.Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience · 2024Review
- Article
- Computational components of visual predictive coding circuitry.Frontiers in neural circuits · 2023Review
- Independent repetition suppression in macaque area V2 and inferotemporal cortex.Journal of neurophysiology · 2022Article
- Contribution of individual features to repetition suppression in macaque inferotemporal cortex.Journal of neurophysiology · 2022Article
- Remembering the Past to See the Future.Annual review of vision science · 2021Article
- Moving a Shape behind a Slit: Partial Shape Representations in Inferior Temporal Cortex.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2021Article
- Long term fMRI adaptation depends on adapter response in face-selective cortex.Communications biology · 2021Article
- Limited Evidence for Sensory Prediction Error Responses in Visual Cortex of Macaques and Humans.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2021Article
- Pinpointing the neural signatures of single-exposure visual recognition memory.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021Article
- Dynamic Suppression of Average Facial Structure Shapes Neural Tuning in Three Macaque Face Patches.Current biology : CB · 2021Article
- Incorporating intrinsic suppression in deep neural networks captures dynamics of adaptation in neurophysiology and perception.Science advances · 2020Article
- Diverse Temporal Dynamics of Repetition Suppression Revealed by Intracranial Recordings in the Human Ventral Temporal Cortex.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Repetition suppression, which refers to reduced neural activity for repeated stimuli, is typically explained by bottom-up or local adaptation mechanisms. However, recent theories have emphasized the role of top-down processes, suggesting that this response reduction reflects the fulfillment of perceptual expectations. To support this, an influential human fMRI study showed that the magnitude of suppression is modulated by the probability of a repetition. No such repetition probability effect was found in macaque inferior temporal (IT) cortex for spiking activity despite the presence of repetition suppression. Contrary to the human fMRI studies that showed an effect of repetition probability, the macaque single-unit study used a large variety of unfamiliar stimuli and the monkeys were not required to attend the stimuli. Here, as in the human fMRI studies, we used faces as stimuli and made the monkeys attend to the stimulus content. We simultaneously recorded spiking activity and local field potentials (LFPs) in the middle lateral face patch (ML) of one monkey (male) and a face-responsive region of another (female). Although we observed significant repetition suppression of spiking activity and high gamma-band LFPs in both animals, there were no effects of repetition probability even when repetitions were task relevant and repetition probability affected behavioral decisions. In conclusion, despite the use of face stimuli and a stimulus-related task, no neural signature of repetition probability was present for faces in a face responsive patch of macaque IT. This further challenges a general perceptual expectation account of repetition suppression.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.