ArticleJournal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society2018
Predicting the tissue depth for remote triggering of drug delivery systems.
Article in Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Ablation of Venous Malformations by Photothermal Therapy with Intravenous Gold Nanoshells.Nano letters · 2023Article
- Materials for Controlled Release of Local Anesthetics.ChemMedChem · 2023Review
- UVA-Triggered Drug Release and Photo-Protection of Skin.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2021Review
- Light-triggered release of conventional local anesthetics from a macromolecular prodrug for on-demand local anesthesia.Nature communications · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Externally triggerable drug delivery systems have promising potential in providing flexible control of the timing, duration, and intensity of treatment according to patient's needs, while reducing side effects and increasing therapeutic efficacy. However, a limitation to translating such systems into clinical practice is the difficulty to predict the tissue depth at which such systems could be safely used in vivo (e.g. activatable at the target site with a clinically-safe energy dosage). An effective method is needed to evaluate the clinical potential of externally triggerable drug delivery systems. Here we have a method and approach to predicting the tissue depth at which a drug delivery system can be safely triggered in vivo by an external energy source. We used in vitro and ex vivo experiments combined with a mathematical model to develop a method to predict activated drug release at different tissue depths, which was then validated in vivo. We constructed these models for liposomal drug delivery systems triggered by two of the most commonly studied external stimuli: ultrasound and near infrared light. We developed the approach in two prevalent tissue types: muscle and fat. Our method identified two important parameters in the activation of drug delivery systems in tissue: 1) the ability of the activating energy to penetrate tissue, 2) the sensitivity of the system to the activation source. The method was validated by correlation with triggered sciatic nerve block in the rat in vivo, demonstrating that this approach provided an accurate estimate of activated release at different tissue depths.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.