Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30030182›Full record

ArticleJournal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society2018

Nanoparticle uptake by circulating leukocytes: A major barrier to tumor delivery.

Jamie L Betker, Dallas Jones, Christine R Childs, Karen M Helm, Kristina Terrell, Maria A Nagel, Thomas J Anchordoquy

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Advancing liposome technology for innovative strategies against malaria.Saudi pharmaceutical journal : SPJ : the official publication of the Saudi Pharmaceutical Society · 2024
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Reducing off-target drug accumulation by exploiting a type-III interferon response.Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Biocompatibility of nanomaterials and their immunological properties.Biomedical materials (Bristol, England) · 2021
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Orally administered gadolinium orthovanadate GdVOWiener medizinische Wochenschrift (1946) · 2020
    Article
  20. The Use of Lactose as an Alternative Coating for Nanoparticles.Journal of pharmaceutical sciences · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jamie L BetkerSkaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, United States.
Dallas JonesDepartment of Neurology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, United States.
Christine R ChildsFlow Cytometry Core Facility, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, United States.
Karen M HelmFlow Cytometry Core Facility, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, United States.
Kristina TerrellFlow Cytometry Core Facility, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, United States.
Maria A NagelDepartment of Neurology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, United States.
Thomas J AnchordoquySkaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, United States. Electronic address: tom.anchordoquy@ucdenver.edu.

Funding

University of Colorado Cancer Center Support Grant - Lung Cancer Patient-Derived Xenografts with Autologous Human Immune SystemsP30CA046934 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI James V Degregori · 1988 to 2026
$117.0M
VARICELLA ZOSTER VIRUS VASCULOPATHY: CHANGING CLINICAL PRACTICEP01AG032958 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI COHRS, RANDALL J. · 2009 to 2023
$30.3M
Tumor-Homing Exosomes for Drug DeliveryR01EB016378 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI ANCHORDOQUY, THOMAS, GRANER, MICHAEL W. · 2013 to 2016
$1.5M
Purinergic Signaling in Varicella Zoster Virus VasculopathyR01NS094758 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI NAGEL, MARIA ACENA · 2015 to 2018
$1.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA046934NIA NIH HHS P01 AG032958NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB016378NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS094758
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Decades of research into improving drug delivery to tumors has documented uptake of particulate delivery systems by resident macrophages in the lung, liver, and spleen, and correlated short circulation times with reduced tumor accumulation. An implicit assumption in these studies is that nanoparticles present in the blood are available for distribution to the tumor. This study documents significant levels of lipoplex uptake by circulating leukocytes, and its effect on distribution to the tumor and other organs. In agreement with previous studies, PEGylation dramatically extends circulation times and enhances tumor delivery. However, our studies suggest that this relationship is not straightforward, and that particle sequestration by leukocytes can significantly alter biodistribution, especially with non-PEGylated nanoparticle formulations. We conclude that leukocyte uptake should be considered in biodistribution studies, and that delivery to these circulating cells may present opportunities for treating viral infections and leukemia.

Indexed as

AnimalsDNAFemaleGene Transfer TechniquesLeukocytesMice, Inbred BALB CMice, SCIDNanoparticlesNeoplasmsPlasmidsPolyethylene GlycolsTissue DistributionDNAPolyethylene GlycolsGene deliveryLeukocyte uptakeLipoplexesPEGylation

Identifiers

PMID30030182
PMCPMC6936323

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.