Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30030134›Full record

Trial reportThe lancet. HIV2018

Targeted combination prevention to support female sex workers in Zimbabwe accessing and adhering to antiretrovirals for treatment and prevention of HIV (SAPPH-IRe): a cluster-randomised trial.

Frances M Cowan, Calum Davey, Elizabeth Fearon, Phillis Mushati, Jeffrey Dirawo, Sungai Chabata, Valentina Cambiano, Sue Napierala, Dagmar Hanisch, Ramona Wong-Gruenwald and 7 more

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in The lancet. HIV, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 81 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
81citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

81 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

21 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Frances M CowanDepartment of International Public Health, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK; Centre for Sexual Health and HIV AIDS Research (CeSHHAR), Harare, Zimbabwe. Electronic address: frances.cowan@lstmed.ac.uk.
Calum DaveyDepartment of Social and Environmental Health Research, Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Elizabeth FearonDepartment of Social and Environmental Health Research, Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Phillis MushatiCentre for Sexual Health and HIV AIDS Research (CeSHHAR), Harare, Zimbabwe.
Jeffrey DirawoCentre for Sexual Health and HIV AIDS Research (CeSHHAR), Harare, Zimbabwe.
Sungai ChabataCentre for Sexual Health and HIV AIDS Research (CeSHHAR), Harare, Zimbabwe.
Valentina CambianoInstitute for Global Health, University College London, London, UK.
Sue NapieralaWomen's Global Health Imperative, RTI International, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Dagmar HanischUnited Nations Population Fund, Harare, Zimbabwe.
Ramona Wong-GruenwaldGesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit, Harare, Zimbabwe.
Nyasha MasukaMinistry of Health and Child Care, Harare, Zimbabwe.
Travor MabugoHealth Economics and Policy Research Initiative, Zimbabwe.
Karin HatzoldPopulation Services International, Harare, Zimbabwe.
Owen MugurungiMinistry of Health and Child Care, Harare, Zimbabwe.
Joanna BuszaDepartment of Social and Environmental Health Research, Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Andrew PhillipsInstitute for Global Health, University College London, London, UK.
James R HargreavesDepartment of Social and Environmental Health Research, Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.

Funding

HIV Prevention among Young Female Sex Workers: an Implementation Research ApproachK01MH110316 · NIMH · RESEARCH TRIANGLE INSTITUTE · PI NAPIERALA, SUE · 2016 to 2019
$753k
NIMH NIH HHS K01 MH110316
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundStrengthening engagement of female sex workers with health services is needed to eliminate HIV. We assessed the efficacy of a targeted combination intervention for female sex workers in Zimbabwe.

methodsWe did a cluster-randomised trial from 2014 to 2016. Clusters were areas surrounding female sex worker clinics and were enrolled in matched pairs. Sites were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive usual care (free sexual-health services supported by peer educators, including HIV testing on demand, referral for antiretroviral therapy [ART], and health education) or an intervention that supported additional regular HIV testing, on-site initiation of ART, pre-exposure prophylaxis, adherence, and intensified community mobilisation. The primary outcome was the proportion of all female sex workers with HIV viral load 1000 copies per mL or greater, assessed through respondent-driven sampling surveys. We used an adapted cluster-summary approach to estimate risk differences. This trial is registered with Pan African Clinical Trials Registry, number PACTR201312000722390.

resultsWe randomly assigned 14 clusters to usual care or the intervention (seven in each group). 3612 female sex workers attended clinics in the usual-care clusters and 4619 in the intervention clusters during the study. Half as many were tested (1151 vs 2606) and diagnosed as being HIV positive (546 vs 1052) in the usual-care clusters. The proportion of all female sex workers with viral loads of 1000 copies per mL or greater fell in both study groups (from 421 [30%] of 1363 to 279 [19%] of 1443 in the usual-care group and from 399 [30%] of 1303 to 240 [16%] of 1439 in the intervention group), but with a risk difference at the end of the assessment period of only -2·8% (95% CI -8·1 to 2·5, p=0·23). Among HIV-positive women, the proportions with viral loads less than 1000 copies per mL were 590 (68%) of 869 in the usual-care group and 588 (72%) of 828 in the intervention group at the end of the assessment period, adjusted risk difference of 5·3% (95% CI -4·0 to 14·6, p=0·20). There were no adverse events.

interpretationOur intervention of a dedicated programme for female sex workers led to high levels of HIV diagnosis and treatment. Further research is needed to optimise programme content and intensity for the broader population.

fundingUN Population Fund (through Zimbabwe's Integrated Support Fund funded by UK Department for International Development, Irish Aid, and Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency).

Indexed as

Medication AdherenceSex WorkersAdolescentAdultAnti-HIV AgentsAnti-Retroviral AgentsFemaleHealth ServicesHIVHIV InfectionsHumansMass ScreeningPre-Exposure ProphylaxisSexual BehaviorViral LoadYoung AdultAnti-HIV AgentsAnti-Retroviral Agents

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.