Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30029696›Full record

ArticleBMC psychology2018

Why is this happening to me? - a comparison of illness representations between Iranian and German people with mental illness.

Judith Reichardt, Amrollah Ebrahimi, Hamid Nasiri Dehsorkhi, Ricarda Mewes, Cornelia Weise, Hamid Afshar, Peyman Adibi, Said Moshref Dehkordy, Gholamreza Yeganeh, Hanna Reich and 1 more

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC psychology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Do Gender and Country of Residence Matter? A Mixed Methods Study on Lay Causal Beliefs about PTSD.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Judith ReichardtDivision of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Department of Psychology, Philipps University Marburg, Gutenbergstraße 18, 35032, Marburg, Germany. judith.reichardt@uni-marburg.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6128-7282
Amrollah EbrahimiPsychosomatic Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.
Hamid Nasiri DehsorkhiPsychosomatic Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.
Ricarda MewesDivision of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Department of Psychology, Philipps University Marburg, Gutenbergstraße 18, 35032, Marburg, Germany.
Cornelia WeiseDivision of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Department of Psychology, Philipps University Marburg, Gutenbergstraße 18, 35032, Marburg, Germany.
Hamid AfsharPsychosomatic Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.
Peyman AdibiGastroenterology research center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.
Said Moshref DehkordyPsychosomatic Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.
Gholamreza YeganehDivision of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Department of Psychology, Philipps University Marburg, Gutenbergstraße 18, 35032, Marburg, Germany.
Hanna ReichDivision of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Department of Psychology, Philipps University Marburg, Gutenbergstraße 18, 35032, Marburg, Germany.
Winfried RiefDivision of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Department of Psychology, Philipps University Marburg, Gutenbergstraße 18, 35032, Marburg, Germany. rief@uni-marburg.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDue to an increase in migration and globalization, cross-cultural encounters in health care are also becoming more frequent. As psychotherapy is grounded in a cultural context and must be congruent with the patient's cultural beliefs of his or her illness in order to be effective, the consideration of cross-cultural differences in illness representations becomes increasingly important. Especially research on illness representations concerning mental disorders is scarce.

methodsThe aim of the current study was to compare illness representations between Iranian (N = 87) and German (N = 90) patient samples as well as subclinical samples (Iranian N = 264, German N = 102) using a multivariate analysis of covariance (MANCOVA). Illness representations were measured using the Illness Perception Questionnaire Revised (IPQ-R). Initially, a factor analysis was conducted in order to ensure comparability of the IPQ-R between the Iranian and the German sample.

resultsThe factor analysis already revealed differences in item compositions of the IPQ-R subscales indicating differences of the conception of illness representations between the samples. Further, the Iranian samples showed a significantly higher amount of supernatural causal beliefs and emotional representation of the illness than the German samples. Surprisingly, the Iranian patient sample showed the highest amount of illness coherence.

conclusionThe current paper contributes to a deeper understanding of cross-cultural differences in illness representations regarding mental disorders. Nevertheless, further research is needed to confirm current findings and to further elaborate on the relationships found.

Indexed as

Attitude to HealthEmotionsPerceptionAdolescentAdultCross-Cultural ComparisonFemaleGermanyHumansIranMaleMental DisordersMiddle AgedSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung AdultCausal beliefsCross-cultural comparisonIllness representationsMental disorders

Identifiers

PMID30029696
PMCPMC6053818

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.