Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30029638›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2018

Healthcare teams as complex adaptive systems: understanding team behaviour through team members' perception of interpersonal interaction.

Peter Pype, Fien Mertens, Fleur Helewaut, Demi Krystallidou

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 72 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
72citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

72 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. The Lifeworld of the Complex Care Hospital Doctor: A Complex Adaptive Phenomenological Study.Health care analysis : HCA : journal of health philosophy and policy · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

12 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Peter PypeDepartment of Family Medicine and Primary Health Care, University Hospital - 6K3, Corneel Heymanslaan 10, B-9000, Ghent, Belgium. peter.pype@ugent.be.ORCID 0000-0003-2273-0250
Fien MertensDepartment of Family Medicine and Primary Health Care, University Hospital - 6K3, Corneel Heymanslaan 10, B-9000, Ghent, Belgium.
Fleur HelewautClinical Skills Training Centre, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University Hospital 2K3, Corneel Heymanslaan 10, B-9000, Ghent, Belgium.
Demi KrystallidouFaculty of Arts (Sint Andries Campus), University of Leuven, Sint Andriesstraat 2, B-2000, Antwerp, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundComplexity science has been introduced in healthcare as a theoretical framework to better understand complex situations. Interdisciplinary healthcare teams can be viewed as Complex Adaptive Systems (CAS) by focusing more on the team members' interaction with each other than on the characteristics of individual team members. Viewing teams in this way can provide us with insights into the origins of team behaviour. The aim of this study is to describe the functioning of a healthcare team as it originates from the members' interactions using the CAS principles as a framework and to explore factors influencing workplace learning as emergent behaviour.

methodsAn interview study was done with 21 palliative home-care nurses, 20 community nurses and 18 general practitioners in Flanders, Belgium. A two-step analysis consisted of a deductive approach, which uses the CAS principles as coding framework for interview transcripts, followed by an inductive approach, which identifies patterns in the codes for each CAS principle.

resultsAll CAS principles were identified in the interview transcripts of the three groups. The most prevalent principles in our study were principles with a structuring effect on team functioning: team members act autonomously guided by internalized basic rules; attractors shape the team functioning; a team has a history and is sensitive to initial conditions; and a team is an open system, interacting with its environment. The other principles, focusing on the result of the structuring principles, were present in the data, albeit to a lesser extent: team members' interactions are non-linear; interactions between team members can produce unpredictable behaviour; and interactions between team members can generate new behaviour. Patterns, reflecting team behaviour, were recognized in the coding of each CAS principle. Patterns of team behaviour, identified in this way, were linked to interprofessional competencies of the Interprofessional Collaboration Collaborative. Factors influencing workplace learning were identified.

conclusionsThis study provides us with insights into the origin of team functioning by explaining how patterns of interactions between team members define team behaviour. Viewing healthcare teams as Complex Adaptive Systems may offer explanations of different aspects of team behaviour with implications for education, practice and research.

Indexed as

General PractitionersHospice and Palliative Care NursingInterprofessional RelationsNurses, Community HealthPatient Care TeamSystems AnalysisAdaptation, PsychologicalBelgiumCooperative BehaviorHome Health NursingHumansInterviews as TopicLearningSystems TheoryComplex adaptive systemsComplexity scienceHealthcare teamsInterdisciplinary communicationInterpersonal interactionInterprofessional relationsPalliative care

Identifiers

PMID30029638
PMCPMC6053823

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.