ArticleBMC genomics2018
RNA-seq assistant: machine learning based methods to identify more transcriptional regulated genes.
Article in BMC genomics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
29 citing papers in PubMed, 66 citations in OpenAlex.
- Molecular signatures and machine learning driven stress biomarkers for rainbow trout aquaculture and climate adaptation.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Transcriptome Derived Artificial neural networks predict PRRC2A as a potent biomarker for epilepsy.Journal, genetic engineering & biotechnology · 2025Article
- Machine Learning-Based Analysis of Differentially Expressed Genes in the Muscle Transcriptome Between Beef Cattle and Dairy Cattle.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Large-scale transcriptomics analysis reveals a novel stress biomarker in CHO cells producing difficult to express mAbs.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Revolutionising Neurological Therapeutics: Investigating Drug Repurposing Strategies.CNS & neurological disorders drug targets · 2025Review
- RNA-ModX: a multilabel prediction and interpretation framework for RNA modifications.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2024Article
- Artificial Intelligence and/or Machine Learning Algorithms in Microalgae Bioprocesses.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Harmonizing heterogeneous transcriptomics datasets for machine learning-based analysis to identify spaceflown murine liver-specific changes.NPJ microgravity · 2024Article
- Article
- ML-GAP: machine learning-enhanced genomic analysis pipeline using autoencoders and data augmentation.Frontiers in genetics · 2024Article
- On the challenges of predicting treatment response in Hodgkin's Lymphoma using transcriptomic data.BMC medical genomics · 2023Article
- NORMSEQ: a tool for evaluation, selection and visualization of RNA-Seq normalization methods.Nucleic acids research · 2023Article
- Computational approaches in rheumatic diseases - Deciphering complex spatio-temporal cell interactions.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2023Review
- DEGnext: classification of differentially expressed genes from RNA-seq data using a convolutional neural network with transfer learning.BMC bioinformatics · 2022Article
- Translatability Analysis of National Institutes of Health-Funded Biomedical Research That Applies Artificial Intelligence.JAMA network open · 2022Article
- Therapeutic drug repositioning with special emphasis on neurodegenerative diseases: Threats and issues.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2022Review
- Article
- Genes and regulatory mechanisms associated with experimentally-induced bovine respiratory disease identified using supervised machine learning methodology.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Identifying novel transcript biomarkers for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) using RNA-Seq datasets and machine learning.BMC cancer · 2021Article
- SIGNAL: A web-based iterative analysis platform integrating pathway and network approaches optimizes hit selection from genome-scale assays.Cell systems · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAlthough different quality controls have been applied at different stages of the sample preparation and data analysis to ensure both reproducibility and reliability of RNA-seq results, there are still limitations and bias on the detectability for certain differentially expressed genes (DEGs). Whether the transcriptional dynamics of a gene can be captured accurately depends on experimental design/operation and the following data analysis processes. The workflow of subsequent data processing, such as reads alignment, transcript quantification, normalization, and statistical methods for ultimate identification of DEGs can influence the accuracy and sensitivity of DEGs analysis, producing a certain number of false-positivity or false-negativity. Machine learning (ML) is a multidisciplinary field that employs computer science, artificial intelligence, computational statistics and information theory to construct algorithms that can learn from existing data sets and to make predictions on new data set. ML-based differential network analysis has been applied to predict stress-responsive genes through learning the patterns of 32 expression characteristics of known stress-related genes. In addition, the epigenetic regulation plays critical roles in gene expression, therefore, DNA and histone methylation data has been shown to be powerful for ML-based model for prediction of gene expression in many systems, including lung cancer cells. Therefore, it is promising that ML-based methods could help to identify the DEGs that are not identified by traditional RNA-seq method.
resultsWe identified the top 23 most informative features through assessing the performance of three different feature selection algorithms combined with five different classification methods on training and testing data sets. By comprehensive comparison, we found that the model based on InfoGain feature selection and Logistic Regression classification is powerful for DEGs prediction. Moreover, the power and performance of ML-based prediction was validated by the prediction on ethylene regulated gene expression and the following qRT-PCR.
conclusionsOur study shows that the combination of ML-based method with RNA-seq greatly improves the sensitivity of DEGs identification.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.