ArticleBMC genomics2018
Plasma small ncRNA pair panels as novel biomarkers for early-stage lung adenocarcinoma screening.
Article in BMC genomics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Value of a Seven-Autoantibody Panel Combined with the Mayo Model in the Differential Diagnosis of Pulmonary Nodules.Disease markers · 2021Trial
- Liquid biopsy diagnostics for non-small cell lung cancer via elucidation of tRNA signatures.Communications medicine · 2025Article
- Diagnosis and treatment of lung cancer: A molecular perspective.World journal of clinical oncology · 2025Article
- Construction of a New Immune-Related Competing Endogenous RNA Network with Prognostic Value in Lung Adenocarcinoma.Molecular biotechnology · 2024Article
- Review
- Exploring the Potential of Non-Coding RNAs as Liquid Biopsy Biomarkers for Lung Cancer Screening: A Literature Review.Cancers · 2023Review
- Mitochondria-derived small RNAs as diagnostic biomarkers in lung cancer patients through a novel ratio-based expression analysis methodology.Genes & diseases · 2023Article
- Review
- Comprehensive Analysis of a tRNA-Derived Small RNA in Colorectal Cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2021Article
- Identification of plasma lipid species as promising diagnostic markers for prostate cancer.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2020Article
- Identification of lncRNA biomarkers for lung cancer through integrative cross-platform data analyses.Aging · 2020Article
- Lack of Efficacy of Combined Carbohydrate Antigen Markers for Lung Cancer Diagnosis.Disease markers · 2020Article
- Ratio-Based Method To Identify True Biomarkers by Normalizing Circulating ncRNA Sequencing and Quantitative PCR Data.Analytical chemistry · 2019Article
- Comprehensive Analysis of Differentially Expressed mRNA, lncRNA and circRNA and Their ceRNA Networks in the Longissimus Dorsi Muscle of Two Different Pig Breeds.International journal of molecular sciences · 2019Article
- Plasma MicroRNA Pair Panels as Novel Biomarkers for Detection of Early Stage Breast Cancer.Frontiers in physiology · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundLung cancer is a major cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide, and around two-thirds of patients have metastasis at diagnosis. Thus, detecting lung cancer at an early stage could reduce mortality. Aberrant levels of circulating small non-coding RNAs (small ncRNAs) are potential diagnostic or prognostic markers for lung cancer. We aimed to identify plasma small ncRNA pairs that could be used for early screening and detection of lung adenocarcinoma (LAC).
resultsA panel of seven small ncRNA pair ratios could differentiate patients with LAC or benign lung disease from high-risk controls with an area under the curve (AUC) of 100.0%, a sensitivity of 100.0% and a specificity of 100.0% at the training stage (which included 50 patients with early-stage LAC, 35 patients with benign diseases and 29 high-risk controls) and an AUC of 90.2%, a sensitivity of 91.5% and a specificity of 80.4% at the validation stage (which included 44 patients with early-stage LAC, 32 patients with benign diseases and 51 high-risk controls). The same panel could distinguish LAC from high-risk controls with an AUC of 100.0%, a sensitivity of 100.0% and a specificity of 100.0% at the training stage and an AUC of 89.5%, a sensitivity of 85.4% and a specificity of 83.3% at the validation stage. Another panel of five small ncRNA pair ratios (different from the first) was able to differentiate LAC from benign disease with an AUC of 82.0%, a sensitivity of 81.1% and a specificity of 78.1% in the training cohort and an AUC of 74.2%, a sensitivity of 70.4% and a specificity of 72.7% in the validation cohort.
conclusionsSeveral small ncRNA pair ratios were identified as markers capable of discerning patients with LAC from those with benign lesions or high-risk control individuals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.