Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30029528›Full record

ReviewBiomolecules2018

Novel Approaches for BAV Aortopathy Prediction-Is There a Need for Cohort Studies and Biomarkers?

Evaldas Girdauskas, Johannes Petersen, Niklas Neumann, Shiho Naito, Tatiana Gross, Annika Jagodzinski, Hermann Reichenspurner, Tanja Zeller

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biomolecules, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Guideline
  3. Guideline
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Non-Coding RNAs as Blood-Based Biomarkers in Cardiovascular Disease.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Review
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Evaldas GirdauskasDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, University Heart Center, Martinistraße 52, 20246 Hamburg, Germany. e.girdauskas@uke.de.
Johannes PetersenDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, University Heart Center, Martinistraße 52, 20246 Hamburg, Germany. joh.petersen@uke.de.
Niklas NeumannDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, University Heart Center, Martinistraße 52, 20246 Hamburg, Germany. n.neumann@uke.de.
Shiho NaitoDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, University Heart Center, Martinistraße 52, 20246 Hamburg, Germany. s.naito@uke.de.
Tatiana GrossDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, University Heart Center, Martinistraße 52, 20246 Hamburg, Germany. t.sequeira-gross@uke.de.
Annika JagodzinskiGerman Center for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Partner Site Hamburg/Lübeck/Kiel, 20246 Hamburg, Germany. a.jagodzinski@uke.de.
Hermann ReichenspurnerDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, University Heart Center, Martinistraße 52, 20246 Hamburg, Germany. reichenspurner@uke.de.
Tanja ZellerGerman Center for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Partner Site Hamburg/Lübeck/Kiel, 20246 Hamburg, Germany. t.zeller@uke.de.
Universität Hamburg · DEUniversity Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf · DEGerman Centre for Cardiovascular Research · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) disease is the most common congenital malformation of the human heart with a prevalence of 1⁻2% in the general population. More than half of patients with a BAV present with a dilated proximal aorta (so-called bicuspid aortopathy) which is associated with an enhanced risk of life-threatening aortic complications. Up to now, the pathogenesis of bicuspid aortopathy as well as the risk stratification of aortic complications has not yet been sufficiently clarified. Recent findings have shown that bicuspid aortopathy features phenotypic heterogeneity. Two distinct valvulo-aortic phenotypes, the so-called root phenotype, as well as a dilation of the tubular ascending aorta, coincide with a significantly different risk for aortal complications. However, the phenotype-based classification that is only based on these two clinical forms is not sufficient to estimate the risk of aortal complications in a prognostically relevant way. Therefore, there is growing clinical interest to assess novel approaches in BAV research and to introduce circulating biomarkers as an elegant diagnostic tool to improve risk stratification in BAV aortopathy. A large scale epidemiological cohort study, ranking from apparently healthy individuals to disease patients, and comprehensive biobanks provide the opportunity to study BAV disease and its complications and to identify novel biomarkers for BAV aortopathy surveillance and prognosis. Firstly, the data indicate that several protein-based biomarkers and non-coding RNA molecules, in particular circulating microRNAs, can serve as relevant molecular biomarkers to predict the course of BAV-associated aortopathy. Here, we review the current literature and knowledge about BAV from a clinical point of view, and report about novel approaches in BAV biomarker research.

Indexed as

Aortic DiseasesAortic ValveBicuspid Aortic Valve DiseaseBiomarkersEarly DiagnosisHeart Valve DiseasesHumansMicroRNAsPhenotypePopulation SurveillancePrognosisBiomarkersMicroRNAsaortopathybicuspid aortic valvebiomarkersmicroRNAs

Identifiers

PMID30029528
PMCPMC6164692
OpenAlexW2883203408

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.