Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30029216›Full record

ArticleJournal of vision2018

Meaning guides attention in real-world scene images: Evidence from eye movements and meaning maps.

John M Henderson, Taylor R Hayes

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of vision, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 63 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
63citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

63 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. The temporal dynamics of semantic guidance in scenes.Attention, perception & psychophysics · 2026
    Article
  2. A population vector model of visual working memory for real-world scenes.Journal of experimental psychology. General · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. A Population Vector Model of Visual Working Memory for Real-World Scenes.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Scene inversion impairs activation of scene-object semantic bias.Attention, perception & psychophysics · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Learning modifies attention during bumblebee visual search.Behavioral ecology and sociobiology · 2024
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

3 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

John M HendersonCenter for Mind and Brain, University of California, Davis, CA, USA.
Taylor R HayesCenter for Mind and Brain, University of California, Davis, CA, USA.

Funding

Guiding Attention in Real-World ScenesR01EY027792 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI John M Henderson · 2017 to 2026
$2.5M
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY027792
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We compared the influence of meaning and of salience on attentional guidance in scene images. Meaning was captured by "meaning maps" representing the spatial distribution of semantic information in scenes. Meaning maps were coded in a format that could be directly compared to maps of image salience generated from image features. We investigated the degree to which meaning versus image salience predicted human viewers' spatiotemporal distribution of attention over scenes. Extending previous work, here the distribution of attention was operationalized as duration-weighted fixation density. The results showed that both meaning and image salience predicted the duration-weighted distribution of attention, but that when the correlation between meaning and salience was statistically controlled, meaning accounted for unique variance in attention whereas salience did not. This pattern was observed in early as well as late fixations, fixations including and excluding the centers of the scenes, and fixations following short as well as long saccades. The results strongly suggest that meaning guides attention in real-world scenes. We discuss the results from the perspective of a cognitive-relevance theory of attentional guidance.

Indexed as

AttentionEye MovementsFemaleFixation, OcularHumansMaleVisual Perception

Identifiers

PMID30029216
PMCPMC6012218

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.